Schiit Lyr Tube Rollers
Mar 10, 2018 at 11:53 AM Post #16,951 of 23,494
Found no evidence to the JW`s being better than the non JW`s of the same era, may be tube variance. Of the 5 pair I had (4 still have), my non JW 47/49 pair is my favorite. Could be the perfectly matched 1959 JW coming into play.. My other sets fit in to the too close to tell any difference.

Very true. I have two pairs of WE 396As and one pair of JW 396A. The WEs sound the same but the JWs just has more pop to instruments. I’m thinking tube variance as well.
 
Mar 10, 2018 at 1:10 PM Post #16,952 of 23,494
Finally got my HE-560s back from HiFiMan service. It's the first time listening to them with the Lyr 2 and it's fabulous. I'm burning in the stock 6BZ7 tubes at the moment so it should be nothing special but it's 3-D gloriousness. The vocals in Mozart Notturnos are to die for with their richness and immediacy and the soundstage is enormous. I can hardly wait to try them with the better tubes like the Tung Sol 2C51.
 
Mar 10, 2018 at 1:31 PM Post #16,953 of 23,494
Selling 1 of my pairs of LM Ericsson 2C51 steel pins. No noise/microphonics on MJ2/Lite Dac 68 with the cans in my profile. PM if interested. I`ll throw in a pair of 83 Reflektor 6N3P-E`s for free.
 
Last edited:
Mar 10, 2018 at 2:44 PM Post #16,954 of 23,494
Nice looking tubes and photo. I enjoy what the WE 396A offers, but I agree that the 6C8G group is another level. Haven't tried the Marconi RCA yet, currently have Ken Rad/NU/Tung Sol/Sylvania. Don't know why the 6C8G has been overlooked, prices are so low. Some of these are $15 a tube vs $60 for the WE 396A. What would a 6C8G cost if it were manufactured today? $100?

+1. Next up for me is giving a REAL audition to all my “rnros recommended/gifted” variants. Way past due !!!
 
Mar 10, 2018 at 4:56 PM Post #16,955 of 23,494
Nice looking tubes and photo. I enjoy what the WE 396A offers, but I agree that the 6C8G group is another level. Haven't tried the Marconi RCA yet, currently have Ken Rad/NU/Tung Sol/Sylvania. Don't know why the 6C8G has been overlooked, prices are so low. Some of these are $15 a tube vs $60 for the WE 396A. What would a 6C8G cost if it were manufactured today? $100?
I have a pair of Marconi, I found them to be less detailed then the Ken-Rad, and almost too much bottom end extension, with less control on bass. Definitely a bass head tube. I much prefer the Ken-Rad. Interestingly, I also have a pair of RCA that sound much closer to the Ken-Rad.
 
Mar 10, 2018 at 5:16 PM Post #16,956 of 23,494
I have a pair of Marconi, I found them to be less detailed then the Ken-Rad, and almost too much bottom end extension, with less control on bass. Definitely a bass head tube. I much prefer the Ken-Rad. Interestingly, I also have a pair of RCA that sound much closer to the Ken-Rad.

Thanks for the comparative notes. Appreciate the description. Makes sense that the RCA is different. My mistake there, on quick glance I saw Marconi RCA. Duh. It says Marconi RVC!
Haven't heard the RCA. Is that one I should listen to? Not that I need another tube. LOL.
 
Last edited:
Mar 10, 2018 at 9:48 PM Post #16,958 of 23,494
Last edited:
Mar 11, 2018 at 1:25 AM Post #16,960 of 23,494
Thanks for the comparative notes. Appreciate the description. Makes sense that the RCA is different. My mistake there, on quick glance I saw Marconi RCA. Duh. It says Marconi RVC!
Haven't heard the RCA. Is that one I should listen to? Not that I need another tube. LOL.
Thanks for the comparative notes. Appreciate the description. Makes sense that the RCA is different. My mistake there, on quick glance I saw Marconi RCA. Duh. It says Marconi RVC!
Haven't heard the RCA. Is that one I should listen to? Not that I need another tube. LOL.
I think the Ken-Rads sound better, but they're pretty close, just didn't find them as detailed.
 
Mar 11, 2018 at 1:29 AM Post #16,962 of 23,494
Last edited:

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top