bosiemoncrieff
Headphoneus Supremus
Still, it looks like the future of digital music is higher then CD 16bit. Even the Yaggdrasil is only 21bit. What about mutibit tech keeps it from sampling at 24bits or higher
At the risk of self-aggrandizement, I will quote myself from another thread, when someone suggested that we invest in 32-bit DACs. 24-bit DACs are likewise ridiculous, but not quite so egregious. Anyway:
32 bits?! Even 24 bits are a pointless waste of time. Bit depth is NOT bit rate (resolution, detail retrieval); it is noise floor, lack of quantization noise. At 32 bits, the signal-to-noise ratio is 192 decibels, meaning that you must listen to your music at 192 decibels above your ambient environment or the ambient noise (refrigerator, traffic, kids, your dac and amp) would mask the quantization noise (which is why 16 bit is fine in real life).
What is 192 decibels? Well deafness occurs at 180 db, so even if you listened to your 32-bit recordings in an anechoic chamber, if you heard their full dynamic range, you're not listening to them now. If you're listening in a university library, at a quiet 30 decibels, even a Saturn V at launch can't quite give you 192 true decibels of dynamic range to overcome the noise floor, though its 200-odd decibels would certainly kill you.
32 bits are bullschiit. 24 bits are bullschiit. Buy an Yggy and call it a day. But be safe out there: sound over 85 decibels can lead to hearing loss.
I add only that hearing 144 db of dynamic range (the SNR of 24 bits) in a quiet environment would likewise put you over the 180db threshold for eardrum rupture and permanent deafness.