Alexsan
Head-Fier
For me, the distribution of weight in these headphones allows me to forget about them when they are on my head. I can say that the additional ~40 grams of weight compared to the 45 Ohm model is imperceptible in practice. I wouldn't worry about it. But we get more powerful magnets that positively affect the sound. I believe that this is a fair deal and, honestly, for the sake of such a sound, I was ready even for an additional 60-80 gramsMaybe @Alexsan could share his experience in this regard. It will probably take several months for the new model reviews to show up.
P.S. 3 days ago I received my DAP Hiby R6 Pro II. I was a little worried if it would have enough power for the Sash Tres SE. But as it turned out, my worries were in vain.
In short, the player: an excellent device. My top musicality (1 bit) ESS9018 was beaten by this device.
First of all, the scale of the presentation and the processing of minor overtones and overtones are striking, even after a stationary source I began to hear a lot of new things in familiar tracks.
Very comfortable feed with a slight slope in the lower mids and lows.
Sash Tres SE pulls at high gain without any problems. At 80% volume, the impact of the bass drum is felt as a beat on the head.
The sound is chic, reminiscent of the scale of presentation and elaboration of details of the stationary r2r DAC Dynafrips Ares II and Chord Gungnir
The unity of the feed is also striking, where the ear was cut on other HF sources - they don’t cut it here. In general, if someone chooses a DAP for Sash Tres, Hiby R6 Pro II is a great option.
Attachments
Last edited: