1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.

    Dismiss Notice

RME ADI-2 DAC Thread

First
 
Back
54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63
65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74
Next
 
Last
  1. JerkChicken
    Yes you can listen to both the IEM and phones output at the same time. Just bear in mind the sensitivity of each other’s HP
     
    Tsukuyomi and cardeli22 like this.
  2. technobear
    See user manual page 36 (you did read the manual, right?)

    DSP settings are remembered separately for each output (LINE, PHONES, IEM).

    If you have not disabled Line Out when Phones are inserted, the Line Out settings will be used.

    Otherwise whichever Phones you plugged in first will dictate the DSP settings.

    As already stated by the last poster, you may have volume control issues depending on the sensitivity and impedance of the Phones and IEMs.
     
    JerkChicken likes this.
  3. mixman
    OK, I tried several inputs and you were right. The SE input on the THX is better sounding. I also went back and forth between the sound of the THX and straight into the RME. While very close, I preferred the sound of the RME. Slightly more highs, clearer bass.

    Now, what amp would be a clear improvement over that of the RME for under let's say $1K?
     
    bidn likes this.
  4. Tsukuyomi
    I've heard that the violectric HPAV100 is a better amp. but since i did own the HPAv200 before. i can tell you that in the v200s case its not true. the amp for the RME ADI-2 DAC is better imo.
     
  5. NickedWicked
    I'd say the V281 is a neat little upgrade to the ADI-2 DAC amp, but I wouldn't say a clear improvement, it's just more compatible with different kinds of headphones.
     
  6. mixman
    Seems like the little RME amp is not too bad, just not balanced. Seems like you have to pay a good amount to do better.
     
    Tsukuyomi likes this.
  7. jerick70
    The amp on the ADI-2 Pro is balanced and does preform better than the DAC amp. But the Pro also cost $1000 more than the DAC. I've owned both. Just food for thought.
     
    Tsukuyomi likes this.
  8. Tsukuyomi
    Thats exactly what ive heard before. I have to agree from popular opinion. The pro does have more power but the price is almost double..
     
  9. Tsukuyomi
    For 95% of most audio enthusiasts, it will be more than enough. For the 5% they will usually avoid buying 2 in 1 units. And prefer to buy an amp and dac unit separately so they can have more freedom for changing and upgrading.
     
    cardeli22 and Giacomino like this.
  10. mixman
    Is the HP amp in the Pro much more powerful than that of the DAC, will it sound better too? Same converters right, just two of them? With the Pro you lose the remote, but yes you do get balanced, also get AD conversion, which I understand makes it good for Vinyl conversion. It just seems like overkill for what we are doing.
     
  11. jerick70
    According to the specs the Pro is more powerful. I thought the sound was better out of the Pro compared to the DAC. YMMV.

    ADI-2 Pro taken from here: http://www.rme-audio.de/en/products/adi_2-pro.php

    Phones 1/2
    As Output 1/2 TS, but:
    • Output: 6.3 mm TRS jack, unbalanced, stereo
    • Output impedance: 0.1 Ohm
    • Signal to Noise ratio (SNR) @ +22 dBu: 117 dB RMS unweighted, 120 dBA
    • Signal to Noise ratio (SNR) @ +7 dBu: 114 dB RMS unweighted, 118 dBA
    • Output level at 0 dBFS, Ref Level +19 dBu, load 100 Ohm or up: +22 dBu (10 V)
    • Output level at 0 dBFS, Ref Level +4 dBu, load 8 Ohm or up: +7 dBu (1.73 V)
    • THD @ +18 dBu, 32 Ohm load, 1.2 Watt: -110 dB, 0.0003 %
    • THD+N @ + 18 dBu, 32 Ohm load: -107 dB, 0.00045 %
    • THD @ +14 dBu, 16 Ohm load, 0.94 Watt: -110 dB

    Output Phones 3/4
    As Output Phones 1/2, but:
    • Output levels at 0 dBFS: Hi-Power off +7 dBu, Hi-Power On +22 dBu

    Balanced Phones mode
    As before, but:
    • Output levels at 0 dBFS: Hi-Power off +13 dBu (9.8 V), Hi-Power On +28 dBu (19.5 V)
    • Output impedance: 0.2 Ohm
    • Signal to Noise ratio (SNR) @ +28 dBu: 120 dB RMS unweighted, 123 dBA
    • Signal to Noise ratio (SNR) @ +13 dBu: 118.4 dB RMS unweighted, 122 dBA
    • Output level at 0 dBFS, Hi-Power On, load 150 Ohm or up: +28 dBu (19.5 V)
    • Output level at 0 dBFS, Hi-Power Off, load 8 Ohm or up: +13 dBu (9.8 V)
    • Max power @ 0.001% THD: 2.9 W per channel

    ADI-2 DAC taken from here: http://www.rme-audio.de/en/products/adi_2-dac.php

    Phones
    As Cinch but:
    • Output: 6.3 mm TRS jack, unbalanced, stereo
    • Output impedance: 0.1 Ohm
    • Signal to Noise ratio (SNR) @ +22 dBu: 117 dB RMS unweighted, 120 dBA
    • Signal to Noise ratio (SNR) @ +7 dBu: 116 dB RMS unweighted, 119 dBA
    • Output level at 0 dBFS, High Power, load 100 Ohm or up: +22 dBu (10 V)
    • Output level at 0 dBFS, Low Power, load 8 Ohm or up: +7 dBu (1.73 V)
    • THD @ +18 dBu, 32 Ohm load, 1.2 Watt: -110 dB, 0.0003 %
    • THD+N @ + 18 dBu, 32 Ohm load: -107 dB, 0.00045 %
    • THD @ +14 dBu, 16 Ohm load, 0.94 Watt: -110 dB, 0.0003 %
    • Max power @ 0.001% THD: 1.5 W per channel
     
    Last edited: Feb 20, 2019
    cardeli22 likes this.
  12. mixman
    Same converter chip, just that the Pro has two correct?
     
  13. jerick70
    Yes. AKM4490EQ
     
  14. MikeW
    I recently purchased a Monoprice liquid platinum to go with my ADI-2. Will give impressions once I receive it and give it some listening, you can't hardly buy a pro-ish, product without a built in headphone amp they all have em... lavry, benchmark, mytek, rme, dangerous, etc.. I find your comparison to the 789 interesting. I've not heard the 789 but I figured it would be a little better then RME's headamp, but it seems like it's mostly comparable from your impression. Im glad I decided to not get one, at least with the Liquid Platinum it's a tube hybrid so even if it's not technically better, it will give some nice tube coloration. I've been without my RME for about a week now, sent it back to Synthax for RMA of defect, still waiting for a replacement, im ready to have it back.. I will say I was/am pretty impressed and surprised by the headamp's performance, as some had led me to believe that it was nothing special and an afterthought/convenience amp. While it may not be the last word in amp power, i'd certainly not describe it as "just there for convenience" or low performance.. not at all. Considering the price of the DAC, it's often paired with end game amps and 1k-3k amps, im sure it does not compare favorably in that scenario, nor should it. But these people forget what a 500$ head-amp sounds like.
     
    Last edited: Feb 20, 2019
    cardeli22 and Quinto like this.
  15. lukeslens
    Will be VERY interested in your impressions of the LP and the ADI-2. I'm hoping to have a similar set-up for my Clears. Am pretty hooked on the balanced performance of the Clears so landed on the RME for a Dac (hopefully soon) but I do like a little color to my sound, especially on the Clears which I love but I feel will probably benefit from some EQ and tubeness. So I'm hoping the LP+ADI2 is the ticket there, but it may be awhile before I can snag the two so will very much be looking forward to your impressions.
     
First
 
Back
54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63
65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74
Next
 
Last

Share This Page