Review: ZERO 24 BIT/192KHz DAC/Headphone Amp/Pre-Amp
Nov 8, 2012 at 12:13 PM Post #9,272 of 9,388
Quote:
Okey. Thank you :)
 
I will check it out. If they are too hot, is it possible that they make/generate pop sounds?

I have tested the dac further. The heatsinks is not very hot, no problem to touch every component in the dac while it's in use.
The BB627 is also getting a little warm, but no problem to touch it either.
 
 
Have checked the underside of the mainboard for solder points, but eveything looks ok.
 
Dont know what to do :frowning2:
 
The popsounds is coming when the music og sound is nearly quiet, when its just ambient sounds its worst.
And its exactly the same from optical, coax and usb. 
 
Nov 11, 2012 at 7:22 PM Post #9,273 of 9,388
Dec 7, 2012 at 5:24 AM Post #9,274 of 9,388
Hi Everybody,
 
 
I've got a Grado SR125, I use them with my ESI Julia sound card and I want to get a better sound quality by connecting a DAC (for example ZERO 24 BIT) to the Julia sound card. I read the post above about the problems with the hiss. I just wonder if is it possible to fix by using an external amp for instance a clone of Grado RA-1 ?  http://www.ebay.com/itm/18V-Cmoy-Ra1-JRC4556-Headphone-Amplifier-Amp-RECHARGEABLE-PP-Compatible-W-Grado-/170952843574?pt=LH_DefaultDomain_0&hash=item27cd956136     
 
Thanks!
 
Dec 7, 2012 at 1:30 PM Post #9,276 of 9,388
sleek2000: if everything is OK (=nothing is defective/damaged) than the hiss is only problem of headphone amplifier and only with sensitive headphones (IEMs, Grados,...). You can either use external headphone amplifier or change the old AMP for a new one (for example see my signature).
tbend: do you need whole or partial schematic?
 
Dec 29, 2012 at 3:50 PM Post #9,278 of 9,388
I've been using my zero amp for several years now, both with my hd595 headphones and my cambridge audio 640a v2 to my vifa premium 11 speakers.
I have read some good things about the amp in the 640a v2, and I was wondering whether anyone knows which one would be better, the zero headphone amp or the 640a v2 amp?
 
Jan 22, 2013 at 7:42 AM Post #9,279 of 9,388
The zero sounds really interesting. Was reading the first ~100pages and some things made me curious so I searched the thread, but seems nobody have a answer what the actual output impedance is of the headphone output. Sure its only important for cans below 100ohm, but for me its some crucial thing to know because I need a amp for mixing/mastering and need to be sure the amp matches my cans (50ohms). Someone knows the actual output impedance?
 
What would be the best opamp combi for a uncolored und neutral playback scenario?
 
Jan 22, 2013 at 11:24 AM Post #9,280 of 9,388
I' not surprised you didn't find it, because there isn't really much in this thread (considering the 619 pages).
 
Output impedance of headphone amp (including impedance of connector) is very low: ~0.5ohm (there is 0.3ohm resistor in series).
 
There isn't any combination of opamps which makes it neutral, because DAC is a bit veiled and headphone amp is quite midrangy.
You can "save" DAC with some bright OA (AD797 could be suitable).
 
Jan 22, 2013 at 11:44 AM Post #9,281 of 9,388
Ok, seems not like a good solution for me then. But regarding the impedance. When its that low, why so many here got problems with low impedance headphones? I'm curious. What did you mean with I could save the dac with some OA. The Opamps ?
 
Jan 22, 2013 at 12:03 PM Post #9,282 of 9,388
Problem with low-Z headphones is because headphone amp has too much gain and it's hard (more like impossible) to set volume that's not too loud but still with good channel balance. Second problem could be caused by head-amp noise, but it's problem only with very sensitive headphones (most IEMs).
The DAC is little dark, so you could save it with brighter operational amplifier.
 
Jan 25, 2013 at 5:14 AM Post #9,283 of 9,388
I think the headphone amp section in this is worth the money in itself, One criticism is the DAC output has a very unclean noise profile (like sizzling eggs) this is very low in level and virtually inaudible at normal listening levels but I would prefer if it was not there. You can only hear it if the you amp/speakers are cranked. The other issue is the case is not earthed which is pretty bad from a safety perspective IMO. I earthed mine myself as the first job out of the box. There is no excuse for this whatsoever and the manufacturer must not do it because of money saving. I recommend anyne buying one check the earthing arrangement and if you cannot do it yourself get an electrician to do it, it is probably a 20 min job for a sparky.
 
The headphone output quality is divine.
 
I am not aware of anything that is this great at this price.
 
Jan 25, 2013 at 7:22 AM Post #9,284 of 9,388
Unclean noise profile isn't really problem of DAC but the S/PDIF reciever (for some reason it gets much worse when using stock USB input).
The output is super clean when the DAC is fed directly by I2S.
 
But I'm also not aware of anything this great at such price (especially after some improvements) so there's really nothing to complaint.
 
Jan 26, 2013 at 6:04 PM Post #9,285 of 9,388
Does anyone have reason to believe that any of the parts in the DAC are fake? like JRC4558 with 627 etched on them and fake Elna/Silmic caps or are they reputable to be genuine parts?
 
My standard shipped OPA2134 * (correction 2604) one sounded ok out of the box but no where near as good as when I popped the 4562's in the headphone board.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top