achristilaw
Headphoneus Supremus
- Joined
- Dec 12, 2006
- Posts
- 1,835
- Likes
- 59
Quote:
Well said my friend. But we don't live in an ideal society. And politicing abounds. The Xin Ref. On a Performance/Price ratio. In my humble opinion. Can't be touched. It's sound is "Music to my ears". And in a class by itself. It's balance and note making are unique. And world class. And that is tarnished with other troubles. Which are well documented and I won't name. Can't really seperate one from the other. When the majority of others don't share that handicap. Can you understand that? As part of the total equation?
Originally Posted by jamato8 /img/forum/go_quote.gif I have enjoyed many amps and continue to enjoy some of them. I can understand a difference in hearing but having heard many amps and having been in high end audio for years and enjoying live music very much to rate the Reference, not because I know Xin etc, etc. , but because of what and only what I hear, down the list, if you are going by sound quality, is silly. I like to be neutral as much as possible but the mids and transparency are one thing I find as one of the most excellent qualities of the Reference. This is with IEM's or large headphones and it helps my puny PortaPros to sound extremely good for what they are. I really can find little if any fault with the Reference. I love music and to me, the Reference IS music. |
Well said my friend. But we don't live in an ideal society. And politicing abounds. The Xin Ref. On a Performance/Price ratio. In my humble opinion. Can't be touched. It's sound is "Music to my ears". And in a class by itself. It's balance and note making are unique. And world class. And that is tarnished with other troubles. Which are well documented and I won't name. Can't really seperate one from the other. When the majority of others don't share that handicap. Can you understand that? As part of the total equation?