wafflezz
100+ Head-Fier
- Joined
- May 29, 2013
- Posts
- 236
- Likes
- 55
Guys I found something interesting
The IM-04 was reviewed by goldenears and its objective measurements were taken.
Hmmm, this one seems...out of place. It's a quite colored sound which some may interpret as distortion and reducing transparency. Interesting how expensive IEMs can sometimes be rated lower in sound quality than cheapos.
for instance the much cheaper ATH-CKx5 with its traditional Audiotechnica "house sound" was actually given a higher subjective rating overall than the im-04. Likewise the resonance levels of the CKx5is were similar apart from a slight disparity near 15khz. But wait! it gets better...The impedance levels for the Ckx5 are actually ruler flat while the IM-04 show some minor inconsistencies. The impulse response actually also indicates a slight advantage to the much cheaper activity/sport oriented ckx5is.
I'm not trying to bash on the im-04 or Audio technica by any means and I'm sure in person the im-04 sounds lovely if a little bit colored. But just a word to the wise, always try to go for objectively best and technical specs in this kind of price bracket. Because if the manufacture messes up a little with the tuning, you end up with little quirks in the sound sig that will be less wonky and possibly even appealing. But if they go a little off balance with a colored type tuning? The results can be eh...less than ideal
EDIT: in the spirit of trying to be objective as possible. I must point out that the IM-04 does actually have a clear advantage when it comes to step response. That is all.
http://en.goldenears.net/index.php?document_srl=54153&mid=GR_Earphones&sort_index=readed_count&order_type=asc&comment_srl=23281
http://en.goldenears.net/index.php?mid=GR_Earphones&document_srl=42223
The IM-04 was reviewed by goldenears and its objective measurements were taken.
Hmmm, this one seems...out of place. It's a quite colored sound which some may interpret as distortion and reducing transparency. Interesting how expensive IEMs can sometimes be rated lower in sound quality than cheapos.
for instance the much cheaper ATH-CKx5 with its traditional Audiotechnica "house sound" was actually given a higher subjective rating overall than the im-04. Likewise the resonance levels of the CKx5is were similar apart from a slight disparity near 15khz. But wait! it gets better...The impedance levels for the Ckx5 are actually ruler flat while the IM-04 show some minor inconsistencies. The impulse response actually also indicates a slight advantage to the much cheaper activity/sport oriented ckx5is.
I'm not trying to bash on the im-04 or Audio technica by any means and I'm sure in person the im-04 sounds lovely if a little bit colored. But just a word to the wise, always try to go for objectively best and technical specs in this kind of price bracket. Because if the manufacture messes up a little with the tuning, you end up with little quirks in the sound sig that will be less wonky and possibly even appealing. But if they go a little off balance with a colored type tuning? The results can be eh...less than ideal
EDIT: in the spirit of trying to be objective as possible. I must point out that the IM-04 does actually have a clear advantage when it comes to step response. That is all.
http://en.goldenears.net/index.php?document_srl=54153&mid=GR_Earphones&sort_index=readed_count&order_type=asc&comment_srl=23281
http://en.goldenears.net/index.php?mid=GR_Earphones&document_srl=42223