You my friend need to try the 846.
Tried in a shop with my iPhone 5s, wasn't impressed with the sound. However no chance to try them with my home set-up which I use with ASG-22. So comparison wasn't fair.
You my friend need to try the 846.
Does the ASG-2 / 2.5 play well with bass centric EDM music? what would you say the main focus of this IEM is?
Im considering getting one of these...
InEar StageDiver 3s (SD-3s) ($600) 3 BA
EarSonics SM64 ($450) 3 BA
Dunu DN-2000 ($315) 2 BA 1 Dynamic
(Sennheiser) iE80 ($270) 1 Dynamic
(Aurisonics) ASG-2 / 2.5 ($550)
Is there anything else i should consider? >.< so many choices...
Does the ASG-2 / 2.5 play well with bass centric EDM music? what would you say the main focus of this IEM is?
Im considering getting one of these...
InEar StageDiver 3s (SD-3s) ($600) 3 BA
EarSonics SM64 ($450) 3 BA
Dunu DN-2000 ($315) 2 BA 1 Dynamic
(Sennheiser) iE80 ($270) 1 Dynamic
(Aurisonics) ASG-2 / 2.5 ($550)
Is there anything else i should consider? >.< so many choices...
Does the ASG-2 / 2.5 play well with bass centric EDM music? what would you say the main focus of this IEM is?
Im considering getting one of these...
InEar StageDiver 3s (SD-3s) ($600) 3 BA
EarSonics SM64 ($450) 3 BA
Dunu DN-2000 ($315) 2 BA 1 Dynamic
(Sennheiser) iE80 ($270) 1 Dynamic
(Aurisonics) ASG-2 / 2.5 ($550)
Is there anything else i should consider? >.< so many choices...
Shure 846, ASG2, IE80.
IE80 is actually a very good option for EDM and/or rock. For other genres, questionable at times. If you listen to other genres equally as EDM then maybe it's best to look elsewhere. ASG2 is a very good option as well. 846 will cost 2.5-3x as much as the IE80.
okay so just to be clear I have 6 questions .. since i haven't heard much about the ASG-2 / 2.5 yet...
1. IS the ASG considered a bassier hybrid?
2. Is the ASG-2 / 2.5 considered one of the more famous hybrid IEMs out right now?
3. Are hybrid IEMs considered to be bassier in general considering the dynamic driver?
4. What kind of music are people generally listening to with the ASG-2 / 2.5?
5. Will I be satisfied with its frequency response compared to the StageDiver 3?
6. What is the difference between the ASG-2 and the ASG-2.5?
Ive had so many positive responses from helpful people trying to give me useful feedback, thank you so much for your time everyone ^-^
If you wouldn't mind addressing each question by number just to be thorough so we don't accidently skip one Id be very grateful!
InEar StageDiver 3I've been really looking forward to this one.
The SD3 is a triple balanced armature phone in a 2-way configuration - 2 bass drivers, and the other handles mids and highs.
It currently retails for 469 Euros at Thommann, which works out to about USD $600, this puts it in line as a direct price competitor to the ASG-2.
Build quality wise, this is a very good looking phone. I love the piano black finish, and it seems they put a lot of work into getting it to fit just right despite its size. It's about 25% larger than the ASG-2, but doesn't even feel that way inside the ears. It may ultimately end up being even more comfortable for some due to its smaller nozzle size. It's really physically reminiscent of the TG334, but even better looking (IMO, of course), and has the advantage of using standard Westone style cables.
As for the sound, this is really one unique phone. I looked into the specs after hearing the phone, and I didn't doubt them at all.
This is one of those cases where the drivers used can tell you how the phone will sound. It's not so much that the bass is terribly emphasized, it's just that the sound is tilted heavily towards that region. It lends to a very warm and thick sound. Though the soundstage is fairly large, the center stage feels quite congested because the mids and bass seem to be fighting for the same space. There is plenty of bleed, and the mids can often stand behind the bass. The treble has just enough presence to avoid being called absent. I also find the timbre of some instruments and, like the electric guitar and snare, to be thrown off by this tonality. Some vocals also come off as a bit stuffy.
Tuning aside, the technicalities are pretty good. Detail retrieval is there, imaging is there, it just sounds really clouded. It's almost like someone tried to copy the FitEar 334, but took a few wrong turns somewhere along the way.
I think the sound could be greatly helped by a few, well-placed strokes of EQ. In fact, I really want to use the same one I used on my ASG-1.2, but I don't have access to my computer anymore.
Now, vs the ASG-2...
Compared to the SD3, the ASG-2 is immediately much clearer in the mids, and the bass is a good deal more controlled. It's also more extended in the bass and treble. The key difference here is just how much more air there is to the sound. The lower mids of the ASG-2 are a step back, and the more linear FR allows for so much more space for the sound cues to dance. Vocals are more holographic, the bass is deeper, with a lot more texture (Party Rock Anthem is a good test for this), and the signature is faster overall.
Test Tracks:
Wish - The Flashbulb
Going from the SD3 to the ASG-2 produces improved clarity on this track, especially with the cymbals and snare hits. The timbre improves slightly, but not as much as I thought it would, given the sound sig differences.
Limit to Your Love - James Blake
I'm using this track to test for bass control, instrument separation, and timbre.
Again, the biggest improvement comes in the form of clarity - not the false clarity that comes with overly boosted treble, but true clarity (whatever that means). There's also greater separation, bass extension, as well as timbre. Gone is the stuffy feeling in the mids and bass. I could "feel" the bass reach further down into my chest, while still remaining tight and impactful. James Blake also did several voice overs in the vocal tracks, and each was more apparent on the ASG-2.
Thirst - City and Colour
The differences are the same here, but there's the added element of rock guitars. The SD3 tended to muck up the guitars, and just lacked overall bite compared to the ASG-2. Whereas the distortion guitars sounded like buzzing, pulsating instruments, the SD3 made them sound more like phones vibrating on a desk.
I had a few more tracks in mind, including some of the ones Sinth sent, but it would be more of me repeating myself.
Conclusion
Now, despite how negatively I may have spoken of the SD3, I think it's a good performing phone. I may even venture to say that it's actually be priced accordingly, given the crazy prices of TOTL iems nowadays. It's just that the ASG-2 is that much better. Still, the SD3 has a very distinct flavor to it that may or may not be to your liking. I can personally appreciate it, but I feel like the ASG-2 is a much better option, especially when you take their similar prices into consideration.
Carlsan will have his pair back soon, so he'll be able to do his own comparison.
okay so just to be clear I have 6 questions .. since i haven't heard much about the ASG-2 / 2.5 yet...
1. IS the ASG considered a bassier hybrid?
2. Is the ASG-2 / 2.5 considered one of the more famous hybrid IEMs out right now?
3. Are hybrid IEMs considered to be bassier in general considering the dynamic driver?
4. What kind of music are people generally listening to with the ASG-2 / 2.5?
5. Will I be satisfied with its frequency response compared to the StageDiver 3?
6. What is the difference between the ASG-2 and the ASG-2.5?
Ive had so many positive responses from helpful people trying to give me useful feedback, thank you so much for your time everyone ^-^
If you wouldn't mind addressing each question by number just to be thorough so we don't accidently skip one Id be very grateful!