tbonner1
Headphoneus Supremus
- Joined
- Mar 13, 2002
- Posts
- 1,566
- Likes
- 12
Fallen Angel-This is mainly because you can build a $150 PPAv2 which will sound no better than a ok-spec'd Pimeta and you can build a $300 PPAv2 which will seriously kick ass.
I agree. However, my point in all of this is that I treat all amps and configurations the same. I don’t pre-judge them prior to listening to them on an equal basis. I document the configuration and then rank them. If I have to eliminate a given amp because it is a discontinued design or lacks a feature or function then it will be one less data point for the rankings. If one specific configuration (such as the PPA V2 with STEPS) does indeed sound better, then it will rank higher. I have heard the PPA with the old diamond buffers and it did sound better. I think the new PPA with STEPS is a top amp despite the fact that it is no longer the Flavor of the Month. It deserves much more than the short shrift it was given by me. However, if I do get around to comparing it, the methodology is still valid because the reader will be able to see how much better it is by a properly configured PPA V2’s subsequent rise in the rankings.
I could have left the lowly CMOY out, but I wanted to show people how it compared to the top amps. I also included the Xtra X-1, which is considered a portable amp, because I thought it would be interesting for people to see how the new wave of portables compared to home amps. It sounded surprisingly good.
I am more concerned about the readers missing out on a great sounding amp because I have “pre judged” it to be not a contender due to it’s configuration, portable/small design, or price. A new Sword Yang Little Dot digital amp may be one example of an inexpensive, small/portable amp that has a separate wall wart type power supply that I would not want to exclude merely because it has what may appear to be a cheap power supply.
They are all merely data points for the purpose of this comparison.
I agree. However, my point in all of this is that I treat all amps and configurations the same. I don’t pre-judge them prior to listening to them on an equal basis. I document the configuration and then rank them. If I have to eliminate a given amp because it is a discontinued design or lacks a feature or function then it will be one less data point for the rankings. If one specific configuration (such as the PPA V2 with STEPS) does indeed sound better, then it will rank higher. I have heard the PPA with the old diamond buffers and it did sound better. I think the new PPA with STEPS is a top amp despite the fact that it is no longer the Flavor of the Month. It deserves much more than the short shrift it was given by me. However, if I do get around to comparing it, the methodology is still valid because the reader will be able to see how much better it is by a properly configured PPA V2’s subsequent rise in the rankings.
I could have left the lowly CMOY out, but I wanted to show people how it compared to the top amps. I also included the Xtra X-1, which is considered a portable amp, because I thought it would be interesting for people to see how the new wave of portables compared to home amps. It sounded surprisingly good.
I am more concerned about the readers missing out on a great sounding amp because I have “pre judged” it to be not a contender due to it’s configuration, portable/small design, or price. A new Sword Yang Little Dot digital amp may be one example of an inexpensive, small/portable amp that has a separate wall wart type power supply that I would not want to exclude merely because it has what may appear to be a cheap power supply.
They are all merely data points for the purpose of this comparison.