oqvist
Headphoneus Supremus
- Joined
- Oct 28, 2004
- Posts
- 8,157
- Likes
- 309
It never gets better when they from the start stretch it thin.
Take LOTR for example. At first Jackson tried to sell in to make it in two movies but he got the go to actually make three. But there is tons of material in that book to support three movies. The movies would have been even greater as only two but I aint complaining. Then they wanted to make Bilbo in three movies. Well all who read it know how much backstory there is in that. I really don´t feel any of the Hobbit movies is close to the LOTR ones. The animated Bilbo is great much better then this as they don´t stretch the story thin.
I have not read neither the hunger games, Divergence or Maze runner books but based on the movies they are more bilbo then LOTR. And it´s flattering to compare it to Bilbo .
Take LOTR for example. At first Jackson tried to sell in to make it in two movies but he got the go to actually make three. But there is tons of material in that book to support three movies. The movies would have been even greater as only two but I aint complaining. Then they wanted to make Bilbo in three movies. Well all who read it know how much backstory there is in that. I really don´t feel any of the Hobbit movies is close to the LOTR ones. The animated Bilbo is great much better then this as they don´t stretch the story thin.
I have not read neither the hunger games, Divergence or Maze runner books but based on the movies they are more bilbo then LOTR. And it´s flattering to compare it to Bilbo .