bavinck
Headphoneus Supremus
- Joined
- Feb 12, 2014
- Posts
- 4,691
- Likes
- 776
I don't think the bass is thin at all. I actually find the bass is nicely textured on the es100.
Yeah I have no idea. It's really weird. This time though he Pause button on the device itself actually workedI think you may have a mentally challenged neighbour who keeps trying to connect to your ES100 haha.
no eq or app whatsoever. thats why the es100 still exists. its not perfect but its the best we can have now@Elzizo I'm interested in how similar they sound. Is the app out? How's the EQ?
So far, sound is very similar to the ES100. No app yet from Fiio, but apparently one is in the works. No independent EQ yet till the app is released.@Elzizo I'm interested in how similar they sound. Is the app out? How's the EQ?
Which one resolves better or has more detail?So far, sound is very similar to the ES100. No app yet from Fiio, but apparently one is in the works. No independent EQ yet till the app is released.
Edit: after listening for a few hours, I'd say the Fiio is a touch on the brighter side compared to the ES100. Mids and Treble seem a little more forward. Bass seems about the same. My comparison IEM is the Audiofly AF1120, which is quite possibly the most neutral IEM I've ever heard.
The iPhone DAC isn't going to produce a true Lossless output though, 24 bit.
The iPhone headphone output is limited in two ways vs the ES100. As far as I know, the iPhone can only output 16-bit audio, and its output power (and CURRENT) will be less than that of the ES100. So if all of your files are 16-bit, you're not getting any resolution bump at the DA stage. However, the DAC implementation in the ES100 is more sophisticated than the iPhone's so it should sound better between that and the increased amp power. As a side note, the iPhone also can't output to 2.5 mm balanced, so if that's something you're interested in, the ES100 is a very affordable option.Thanks for the reply. I am trying to understand what I get via the ES100 as compared to the HO and indeed as compared to the DFR I have. For lossless ALAC.
If I was enlightened on that, then I’d quickly get one off Amazon.
After a full day of listening back and forth between the 2, I'd have to say the Fiio BTR3 resolves better than the ES100 when strictly comparing 3.5mm unbalanced. The BTR3 is just a touch on the bright side, so female vocals and guitars really "pop", where they sound like velvet on the ES100 playing the same track. They really are pretty different devices the more I listen to each of them.Which one resolves better or has more detail?
Welcome to the party! Just remember to run the latest firmware update first thing.Joining the club, ordered it on Amazon today... excited!
Combine the BTR 3 design/material with the software/hardware of the ES100 Would be the perfect mobile bluetooth dac.