Radsone EarStudio ES100
Dec 24, 2018 at 9:37 AM Post #3,586 of 6,675
Does anybody know if ES100 is good for watching movies? I am thinking to get a bluetooth transmitter for my TV and watch netflix using my HD600. However, I am not sure if the latency will be acceptable or not because there is no APTX-LL support on ES100.

Do you really think there's a need in aptX-LL for movies? I bet It's only for gaming.
 
Dec 26, 2018 at 1:32 PM Post #3,590 of 6,675
Hello. Is this considered warm or bright? I'm now considering this versus Sony NW-A55 - I'm leaning towards warm. Thanks.

It's warmish, definitely not bright.
 
Dec 26, 2018 at 1:48 PM Post #3,592 of 6,675
I find the sound to be pretty neutral, maybe a bit warm. Listening to metal music often and found that ES100 matches quite well the genre. Highs are clear and gentle with decent source.
 
Dec 26, 2018 at 2:09 PM Post #3,593 of 6,675
Noted on this. Warm as Sony's or it's like warm to neutral?

It's been a long time since I've heard a Sony player but I'd say the ES100 is slightly warm if that makes sense. It's warmer sounding than the Aune M1s, Opus#1 and the SMSL IQ for example. Maybe mostly similar to the Shanling M1 (slightly less on the balanced output ).
 
Dec 26, 2018 at 3:00 PM Post #3,594 of 6,675
Hello. Is this considered warm or bright? I'm now considering this versus Sony NW-A55 - I'm leaning towards warm. Thanks.
I’d say neither. Rather soft, hazy. Not veiled though, the detail is there but it’s AKM’s so-called “velvet” tuning. Like @Broquen I find it nice for metal, because it corrects overly aggressive mixes.
Edit: I used to have an A25 Sony DAP, that entry-level range is pretty lackluster imo. I’d advise to go for the ES100, you’ll get superior convenience and form factor, an amazing app, great sound, and a tuning you’re probably less used to. I say this as someone who really enjoys Sony’s warm amps.
 
Last edited:
Dec 26, 2018 at 8:45 PM Post #3,596 of 6,675
Any news of ES100 mk2 ?
 

Attachments

  • 4FCE999D-C8C3-4EFA-9894-D7217DC03B7F.jpeg
    4FCE999D-C8C3-4EFA-9894-D7217DC03B7F.jpeg
    935.9 KB · Views: 0
  • 10C1DD51-B6CA-4FC6-AB09-3A3AE73F88B2.jpeg
    10C1DD51-B6CA-4FC6-AB09-3A3AE73F88B2.jpeg
    694.6 KB · Views: 0
Last edited:
Dec 27, 2018 at 2:38 AM Post #3,598 of 6,675
I find the sound to be pretty neutral, maybe a bit warm. Listening to metal music often and found that ES100 matches quite well the genre. Highs are clear and gentle with decent source.

Thanks for this. Not sibilant or no hints of bright sound so far?

It's been a long time since I've heard a Sony player but I'd say the ES100 is slightly warm if that makes sense. It's warmer sounding than the Aune M1s, Opus#1 and the SMSL IQ for example. Maybe mostly similar to the Shanling M1 (slightly less on the balanced output ).

Noted on this. I'll check those.

I’d say neither. Rather soft, hazy. Not veiled though, the detail is there but it’s AKM’s so-called “velvet” tuning. Like @Broquen I find it nice for metal, because it corrects overly aggressive mixes.
Edit: I used to have an A25 Sony DAP, that entry-level range is pretty lackluster imo. I’d advise to go for the ES100, you’ll get superior convenience and form factor, an amazing app, great sound, and a tuning you’re probably less used to. I say this as someone who really enjoys Sony’s warm amps.

Noted on this. Just really wanted to know if it's warm. Seems this will be the cheapest and lightest setup for now.

Thank you guys for your input. I'll be coming by the way from xDuoo X3 which I found it neutral to bright.
 
Dec 27, 2018 at 3:18 AM Post #3,599 of 6,675
Thanks for this. Not sibilant or no hints of bright sound so far?
No. At least, if they're not already on the recording. Passed Thunderstruck's AC/DC and other hard highs tracks without problem, but please note that I always use Tidal's Hi-Fi as quality standard. IMO extremes extend less and lose definition whichever bluetooth codec u use, but with aptX HD and/or LDAC 990kbps the differences vs. wired are less noticeable and SQ is really good for this tinny thing.
 
Dec 27, 2018 at 5:41 AM Post #3,600 of 6,675
No. At least, if they're not already on the recording. Passed Thunderstruck's AC/DC and other hard highs tracks without problem, but please note that I always use Tidal's Hi-Fi as quality standard. IMO extremes extend less and lose definition whichever bluetooth codec u use, but with aptX HD and/or LDAC 990kbps the differences vs. wired are less noticeable and SQ is really good for this tinny thing.

Thanks on this. I think I'm considering this now considering the cost and the sound quality I think compared to xDuoo X3 then I'll hook it up on my phone.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top