1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.

    Dismiss Notice

Radsone EarStudio ES100

Discussion in 'Portable Headphone Amps' started by m4rkw, Dec 12, 2017.
First
 
Back
127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136
138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147
Next
 
Last
  1. tayano
    Is there any point in getting these if you have an iphone? I’d be limited to aac as I understand, and I’m sure wired IEMs must be a step above bluetooth w. AAC.
     
    Last edited: Aug 9, 2018
    CardigdanWalk likes this.
  2. CardigdanWalk
    I have these with iPhone and Spotify using AAC.

    Without a doubt worth it, I’ve got a short cable so it keeps me hands free and less dangly wires too.

    Trying to find a way to make a neckband hack version of it without much luck.
     
  3. C_Lindbergh
    Yees, the EQ is amazing and its systemwide once you've connected it.
     
    monsieurfromag3 likes this.
  4. tayano
    I do understand that the freedom is appealing, and that the EQ is nifty. But SQ-wise, how is it compared to wired? Sucks that apple doesnt support ldac.
     
  5. lucifero13
    can the VE Zen 2.0 (non black or white) be driven by this bad boy?
     
  6. SubMash
    AAC is not worse than LDAC.
     
    trellus likes this.
  7. PiSkyHiFi
    Let's all try really hard to not go down this path again. There's already plenty in the archives of this thread and many could not agree, also we'll just end up butting heads with the forum moderators.
     
    bidn likes this.
  8. SubMash
    Just prove otherwise or keep silence. I said my points. You want people not to buy ES100, because iPhone doesn't have LDAC and think they would lose anything? Then prove it - that's it.
     
  9. Elzizo
    In your opinion

    *grabs popcorn
     
    C_Lindbergh likes this.
  10. C_Lindbergh
    LDAC is far superior

    *Grabs bucket of popcorn*
     
  11. PiSkyHiFi
    As I said, I think many have had their say already, no need to repeat the whole process - we can't prove anything here, we just express opinions and this really is the wrong place to discuss it - there are still active discussions in sound science for those willing to pull their hair out.

    [grabs some of the other guys popcorn]
     
    trellus likes this.
  12. Lunar Eclipse
    corn nuts are better than popcorn
    *munches banana*
     
  13. tayano
    AAC over bluetooth is limited to 256kbps, no? You’re saying AAC 256kbps is as good as lossless?
     
  14. shrimants
    Aac is not encoded the same way as other codecs. It is not comparable via measurement. The codec itself is subjective in how it was designed. You cannot compare it to the other codecs via measurements. You can only listen and a/b test it.
     
    SubMash likes this.
  15. shrimants
    The other codecs used are also not lossless. They're just reasonably close.
     
First
 
Back
127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136
138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147
Next
 
Last

Share This Page