Thanks! That sounds great! I actually also tried the Q 701 over a year and a half ago and so I can't really remember too many details about the experience. I think I'll go ahead and get the FiiO E07K at Sonic Electronix and use their SONICBOWL discount code to get it for $75.95.
And nice anime picture there, by the way! I just need to somehow get a Sonic picture drawn up by a friend or do some Photoshopping to get a AKG-i-fied Sonic for a new profile picture.
EDIT: Just to ask, how much of a difference in performance should I expect going from unamped to amped with a Q 701? I just sold off my O2 amp (long story) and didn't have any outboard gear to demo the K 702. It goes without saying much that if I loved this unamped, I might be floored by it when it's properly powered.
I think you may or may want to consider your purchase of choosing to underpower the Q701's. I just don't you to be like in the near future "Darn I should have saved the extra $100 and bought the ODAC". I'd like you to be happy with your purchase and not look back.
My original setup with the AKG Q701's were the E07K and E12, I paid $200 in total. When I could have just skipped that and went straight to the ODAC/O2 which was also $200.
On a sidenote though, I keep my E07K and E12 to pair with my sony walkman. My Vmoda M100's (a much lower impedence headphone), LOVE the bass boost features. +40db basshead heaven!
I'm not going to answer specifically how much of a difference between proper/underamping, because it's up to your ears whether there's a difference or not. Although I can tell you what it sounds like to me when amping vs unamping.
Before I begin though, I'm in no way looking down on the E07K when it powers the Q701's, but I'm just being straightforward in what I found when properly amping vs underamping
Proper Amping (ODAC/Objective 2)
-DETAILS, every reverb, every bubble of saliva from a properly recorded vocal acoustic track is heard.
-Solid hard bass, although a bit on the lean side.
-Full mids, mids are detailed, forwarded, and all the instruments actually seem to revolve around the vocals.
-Highs are less airy due to the full mids. They're more controlled and textured, if you don't like peaky highs, then the midrange warmth and extra bass will make the Q701's fairly balanced to the point of being fairly flat within a 5db range.
-The AKG Q701's are HUGE, amping the Q701's makes it seem like the drivers take up the entire headphone, the soundstage gets that much bigger. Including depth! Amping the Q701's make them much more worth it for gaming purposes. If a bullet whizzes in front of you 3m away, it will sound like a bullet came from the 4 o'clock direction and whizzes past your face to the 11 o'clock direction. (Battlefield 3)
Underamping
-The Q701's have a narrower soundstage, they actually sound fairly natural and not ultra wide compared to when amped. More like a 2 layered soundstage and a bit compressed feeling.
-Flat soundstage. See, when unamped, the soundstage has less depth, and the mids aren't as forwarded. This is actually a plus in my book, because the unforwarded mids lets the treble resonate and the brush sticks from hi hats sound much more lovelier.
-Less bass, now, I found this subjective. When it came to my salsa, jazz, electronic, rock music, the treble was too emphasized, and the lack of bass was quite underwhelmed.
When it came to my Opera, classical, acoustic music, I lost my airyness, but then I also lost a lot of soundstage depth in which was missing in nice recordings.
-Another benefit of underamping? It's not hard to do and it will save your wallet!
My opinion?
Properly amp it. All I have to say is that the soundstage and depth is so unrealistic and hard to find in other kinds of cans. Some people on this forum even say that the next reasonable upgrade from the Q701's would be the Sennheiser HD800's.