Sonic Defender
Headphoneus Supremus
Thanks mate, appreciate it.https://www.alpha-audio.nl/review/review-pioneer-se-monitor5-hoofdtelefoon/5/
Graphs are not very high quality though
Thanks mate, appreciate it.https://www.alpha-audio.nl/review/review-pioneer-se-monitor5-hoofdtelefoon/5/
Graphs are not very high quality though
I owned, and loved the D7000, TH900 and TH600, but of them all I suspect I would still prefer my SEM5. I completely agree with you about just how well this headphone responds to any equalization effort. I also slightly warm it up, just a touch and man can this headphone do most things very well and a few things exceptionally well. Certainly an underappreciated headphone. I'm keeping mine. Cheers.Just picked up some barely broken in Monitor 5's, at first I wasn't impressed, sounded dry. I'm used to the sound of my Fostex TH900 mk2, but after a short time my ears warmed up to them. Very different take on the mids which I'm really digging. Much more neutral signature which is easy to warm up if needed with some EQ. Can't say enough about the build quality, and really like the shorter cable compared to the long ass one included with the Fostex's and no handling noise from the cable. They play well with a variety of genre's while the Fostex's are best with pop, and bass heavy material. Dream Theater is one of my favorite groups and it's interesting to listen to what stands out between the two headphones. The monitor 5's put more emphasis on the guitars and the TH900's on the bass drums. I think I prefer the monitor 5's in this case.
Congratulations! I've had my sem5 for a year and have bought and sold a dozen other open and closed headphones. Sem5 are keepers. Will never sell them. Enjoy!Just picked up some barely broken in Monitor 5's, at first I wasn't impressed, sounded dry. I'm used to the sound of my Fostex TH900 mk2, but after a short time my ears warmed up to them. Very different take on the mids which I'm really digging. Much more neutral signature which is easy to warm up if needed with some EQ. Can't say enough about the build quality, and really like the shorter cable compared to the long ass one included with the Fostex's and no handling noise from the cable. They play well with a variety of genre's while the Fostex's are best with pop, and bass heavy material. Dream Theater is one of my favorite groups and it's interesting to listen to what stands out between the two headphones. The monitor 5's put more emphasis on the guitars and the TH900's on the bass drums. I think I prefer the monitor 5's in this case.
For me, a cable is a cable, if you're asking about the materials the cable is made from. I have never heard a cable make a difference. I would think you could get a 2.5mm TRRS to 4 pin XLR adapter made or already off the shelf, but I don't know that for a fact.Can anyone recommend a balanced 4-pin XLR cable for these?
I agree, the stock cables sound great and additionally, I actually like the material used. It isn't perfect, but the cables seem pretty kink resistant, in general. This is a definite hidden gem of a headphone. I adore my Edition X V2 and Klipsch HP-3 and listen to these most of all since acquiring them. Saying that, every time I grab the SEM5 and use it without exception I am so impressed at just how good they sound and that despite the other two headphones having a tilt toward warmth, that I don't find the SEM5 analytical in comparison. I do use a little bass boosting and other very minor EQ adjustments on the SEM5, but they are minor enough that the overall tonal balance remains pretty darn true to the stock signature. Beautifully made headphone, feels like one of the best made headphones that I have ever owned.I agree with Sonic, use the 2.5mm balanced cable and get an XLR adapter. The stock cables are fantastic
I agree, it is quite a nice headphone. The build quality and ergonomics I feel are exceptional. The sound signature isn't perfect, but it is darn good IMO. If somebody is used to a nice warm sounding headphone and then tries the SEM5 they may find it feels like it is too cool sounding, and it does move toward neutral more than towards warmth, but I do feel that it is a solid effort by Pioneer. I am very happy that I still have mine.Just joined the club. Must admit its a very high quality set both in build and sound. Running off a S.E.X 2.1 and Resnoessence Herus and it shows it pedigree.
Welcome back Pioneer. Its been a long journey to this from the Pioneer car stereos of my childhood.
I agree, it is quite a nice headphone. The build quality and ergonomics I feel are exceptional. The sound signature isn't perfect, but it is darn good IMO. If somebody is used to a nice warm sounding headphone and then tries the SEM5 they may find it feels like it is too cool sounding, and it does move toward neutral more than towards warmth, but I do feel that it is a solid effort by Pioneer. I am very happy that I still have mine.
I agree. I have had an Elegia on hand to audition, and I owned the HD800S as well as a TH900 and TH600. Sadly not all at the same time mind you.I'm using some Mrspeakers tuning pads and it's warming them up just a little bit. The resolution and clarity is TOTL, good enough to be called a closed HD800 and goes toe to toe with the Elegia and Fostex TH series.