Pictures of Your Portable Rig (part XVI)
Feb 26, 2013 at 4:06 AM Post #2,416 of 37,704
I'm so tempted to get a pair of Earsonics just because my real life initials are ES!
 
Feb 26, 2013 at 5:10 AM Post #2,418 of 37,704
The rig looks great...it would deserved some nice customs :) Mike from headphonia loved the Vorzuge Amp but said it had issues because the gain was too high. Maybe that does not apply with the DX100 as the output has variable volume.


Intending to get my customs end of this year kind broke right now. I set my output volume to max on the dx100 my vorzuge is of the newest batch the gain has already been adjusted by vorzuge cos they had complains from iems and cans users :)
 
Feb 26, 2013 at 6:30 AM Post #2,419 of 37,704
Quote:
My Earsonic Sm 64 set up :
Source : AK 100 stock 
amo : Ortofon MHd Q7
iem : Earsonic Sm 64 first batch 112 ohm 
Cable : mini to mini Ventura craft
sound quality : excellent sound quality 
 

 
How do you like your SM64? :) Are you planning on getting them upgraded?
 
Feb 26, 2013 at 7:07 AM Post #2,420 of 37,704
Quote:
 
How do you like your SM64? :) Are you planning on getting them upgraded?

No I don't think so for upgrade , I like my 1st batch sm 64 with higher impendance , if I am not mistaken 112 ohm .because I love the clarity with higher impendance .
i have read in your sm 64 thread that the lower impendance has less bright 
is that true ? Pair with my studio v 3rd edition sound very good too.
Quote:
This wood table has seen more great rigs than anybody on headfi.

Thank you Michael 
Quote:
I'm so tempted to get a pair of Earsonics just because my real life initials are ES!

Yes it is , sm 64 SQ is very good 
 
Feb 26, 2013 at 10:34 AM Post #2,422 of 37,704
Quote:
No I don't think so for upgrade , I like my 1st batch sm 64 with higher impendance , if I am not mistaken 112 ohm .because I love the clarity with higher impendance .
i have read in your sm 64 thread that the lower impendance has less bright 
is that true ?
 
Yes it is , sm 64 SQ is very good 

 
It does nothing to the highs except getting rid of this little bit of sibilance you might witness from time to time. And the mids are a bit more forward which I doesn't really care about. If you don't hear any sibilance, then you don't need the upgrade :)

What would you compare the SM64 with? SQwise. And do you think, using an amp is necessary?
 
Feb 26, 2013 at 11:51 AM Post #2,423 of 37,704

 
 
Sorry for the crappy picture.. took it with iphone 4..
 
Ak100 - DIY LOW profile TWag v2 Gold IC - Vorzuge Duo Amp - Reshelled TF10 w TWagv2 Gold Cable
 
Feb 26, 2013 at 12:08 PM Post #2,424 of 37,704
Is the internal headphone amp of the ak100 really that bad ? Everyone seems to use an amp with them . Does the ak100 have a proper line out?
 
Feb 26, 2013 at 10:50 PM Post #2,430 of 37,704
Quote:
My Earsonic Sm 64 set up :
Source : AK 100 stock 
amo : Ortofon MHd Q7
iem : Earsonic Sm 64 first batch 112 ohm 
Cable : mini to mini Ventura craft
sound quality : excellent sound quality 
 
 
 
 
 

hey can you compare the Sm64 against EX1000? Sound qualitywise how do they compare?
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top