Would I be better off going with a portable amp/dac like the HA-2 with my Note 4 or getting a DAP like the iBasso DX50 for my IEM's?
I had the DX50 / DX90 in the past. OPPO HA-2 will outperform both.
Would I be better off going with a portable amp/dac like the HA-2 with my Note 4 or getting a DAP like the iBasso DX50 for my IEM's?
Is this the one? http://www.ttvjaudio.com/Nightscout_TTVJ_Micro_USB_to_Micro_USB_Cable_p/ttvj000001.htm
What phone are you using? Do you have the short or long? It says the [COLOR=FF0000]red[/COLOR] end is for the phone. I didn't know OTG cables had device specific ends. I just grabbed the stock cable and plugged it in at random when I tried the HA-2 last night in the store.
Would I be better off going with a portable amp/dac like the HA-2 with my Note 4 or getting a DAP like the iBasso DX50 for my IEM's?
That's pretty strange. My 88 dB SPL/mW, 669-ohm AKG K240 Monitor headphone gets plenty loud for me with the HA-2 on high gain, maximum digital volume, and level 4 analogue volume as a PC USB soundcard as well as a USB DAC with my iPhone with some of my quietest music tracks. I'd say the K240 Monitor is a tougher load for the HA-2 compared to the HE-560 because as I mentioned earlier, the HA-2 is voltage limited due to the battery. Analogue volume level 5 is too loud for me in a quiet room and volume 2.5 is about my comfortable listening volume level.
Low gain, maximum digital volume, level 5 analogue volume is still pretty loud for me and for not-as-quiet music, I would probably never use high gain.As per OPPO's official specifications:
https://www.oppodigital.com/headphone-amplifier-ha-2/headphone-amplifier-HA-2-Features.aspx
300 mW into 16 Ohm, or 2.19 Vrms voltage output, 136.93 mA current output
220 mW into 32 Ohm, or 2.65 Vrms, 82.91 mA current output
30 mW into 300 Ohm, or 3 Vrms voltage output, 10 mA current output
So 136.93 mA is the maximum current the HA-2 can deliver, and 3 Vrms is the maximum voltage the HA-2 can deliver
AKG K240 Monitor's official sensitivity rating
88 dB SPL @ 1 mW
My measured impedance rating: 669-Ohms
P = I * V
P = Vrms^2 / R
0.001 W = Vrms^2 / 669-ohms
0.8179 = Vrms
0.001 W = 0.8179 Vrms * I
I = 1.22 mA
Voltage limited to 3 Vrms, so how much maximum power can be outputted into a 669-ohm load?
P = (3 Vrms)^2 / 669-ohms = 0.01345 W or 13.45 mW
13.45 mW = 1 mW * 2^x
13.45 = 2^x
log(13.34) = x * log(2)
x = 3.74
88 dB SPL + 3 dB SPL * 3.74 = 99.22 dB SPL maximum loudness
Remember that the HA-2 can get the HE-560 to 108 dB SPL. So yes, the K240 Monitor is a more difficult headphone for the HA-2 to drive.
I prefer using my phone as a transport, but you can argue either way depending on your use case. Things I like about using a smartphone this way, rather than carrying a separate DAP: no hokey UI, ability to use apps like Spotify/Tidal/DS Audio (for my NAS), ability to use with my laptop and work computer, not having to concern myself with what DAC and implementation a manufacturer has used when it comes time to buy my next phone (although granted a DAP will also do that for you).
Maybe someone compared HA-2 vs Herus?
Does the Apple USB input NOT draw power so that it will not be a problem for iPads etc with restricted power out of the USB.
I don't use Apple anything, but using the internal battery would be good for insuring clean power to the DAC/amp.
If this doesn't work the way I hope, what is the real differences between the two US inputs?
Is this the one? http://www.ttvjaudio.com/Nightscout_TTVJ_Micro_USB_to_Micro_USB_Cable_p/ttvj000001.htm
What phone are you using? Do you have the short or long? It says the [COLOR=FF0000]red[/COLOR] end is for the phone. I didn't know OTG cables had device specific ends. I just grabbed the stock cable and plugged it in at random when I tried the HA-2 last night in the store.
When connected to a PC, the HA-2 draws power from the PC. The power is used to operate the circuits and charge the battery. You will see the charging indicators blink if the battery is not already fully charged.
When connected to an Android device using the supplied USB Micro B cable, the HA-2 does not draw power from the mobile device. If it is connected using a common OTG dongle, the HA-2 will not know that it is connected to a mobile device and will try to draw power.
iOS devices are special because Apple has a protocol called iAP for the iOS device and its peripherals to negotiate everything, including power consumption, charging current and audio data. The HA-2 does not draw power from the iOS device. It can supply power if the power bank function is turned on.
There is no ground galvanization or isolation (in the strict sense) between the HA-2 and the source device. However the ground from the input ports are considered "power ground", and there are design measures taken to treat power ground, digital ground and analog ground properly in order to avoid problems caused by improper ground current or by interference.
The supplied USB Micro B cable is the key for the HA-2 to know that it is connected to an Android device. The cable is basically two common OTG dongles connected back to back with a special resistor on the detection line for identification. When this cable is used, the HA-2 does not draw power from the Android device.
If the HA-2 is connected to a computer or an Android device using regular OTG dongle, it will draw power from the source device. The charging circuit inside the HA-2 will decide how much power it can draw by gradually stepping up the current and monitoring the voltage. If the voltage drops too much it will back off to a lower charging current. Of course if there is no power to draw (such as in the case of the Sony Walkman connection), the HA-2 will use its own battery power.
Thanks for the detail. Are these are DC calculations?
[COLOR=A52A2A]I get the impression something is missing.[/COLOR] The HE-6 planar headphones have DC resistance of 50 Ω yet most people seem happiest with speaker amps.
In there some type of AC impedance change with planar phones that means they need to be amped differently?
Or do they need higher voltage? Some portable headphone amps tout output of 7V or higher.
I received my HA-2 today. Before I purchased it, I emailed Oppo and they said it would be compatible with my iPod Classic 160 GB firmware 2.0.4 and I could bypass the DAC in the iPod using the USB connection. wood1030 also confirmed that his iPod with that same firmware worked in an earlier post on page 37 of this thread, and he posted a picture on that page showing the HA-2 as recognized in the Settings>About screen from the iPod. I tried the same thing and it did not work on my iPod. I don't know why his worked and mine didn't, maybe he has a different model with a different serial number. My serial is MC297LL. Also, I can't get the fourth click spot in the Settings>About mode to show up on my iPod. Mine has only three spots.
I have both the Herus & HA-2 and I just recently updated my Oppo PM-3 review w/ impressions (currently in progress though, so may be subject to change). Full PM-3 review in my signature, Ctrl+F to "Portable amp/dac" to just skip down to the Herus and HA-2.
[size=14.9499998092651px]Portable Amp/Dacs: I tested the PM-3 with the Resonessence Herus and Oppo HA-2 individually on my S5 and laptop. Greatly enjoyed both pairings and they were adequate to drive the PM-3 without any noticeable clipping. Improved detail resolution and sound stage with both the Herus and HA-2. Precision of the imaging is stellar on both portable devices. The Herus has a brighter presentation than the rest of the dacs I own. This pairing can help improve the treble clarity and sharpness of the PM-3 without any excessive edginess. The Herus would be a good match if the treble presentation is too smooth or recessed for your personal tastes or if you like to subtly dial down the warmth in the sound signature. The PM-3's tuning and presentation prevents the sound from ever getting piercing or strident even with a bright dac. Link to the head-fi Herus thread here. I am still getting familiar with the HA-2; may comment in more detail on its sound later. Initial impressions are extremely positive and I feel that it is a great pairing for the PM-3. So far, the HA-2 does not appear to significantly alter the PM-3's overall sound signature to my ears, but it does improved the overall clarity throughout the frequency response. I immediately noticed improved sub-bass quality, deeper lower frequency extension, and better defined solid bass impact with the HA-2. The HA-2 is more revealing of subtle micro-details in the texture and improved the overall tonality with a realistic weight and presence to the notes. The bass boost feature provides an extremely clean bass 5dB boost frequencies below 100 Hz that tapers to 500 Hz. There is no muddiness or bleeding into the rest of the frequency response. You actually cannot hear a difference in the sound at all with bass boost on/off if you play music that does not have any notes below 500 Hz. I normally have the HA-2 set on low gain, no bass boost, volume pot at 1-2 out of 5 with the S5's volume maxed out. The HA-2 can even drive my HE-560 without any clipping to my preferred listening levels (maxed out volume on the S5 with analog volume pot at 2-3 out of 5 on high gain). Do note that precise volume-matching was a lot harder to do here with the Herus on the S5 having large volume steps, while the HA-2 allows extremely precise fine-tuning of volume levels with the combination of the Sabre dac chip's bit-perfect internal digital volume control and analog volume pot. There is no digital signal processor in the HA-2 and the bass boost is performed by pure analog audio circuits for a clean signal path. Link for HA-2 head-fi thread here.[/size]
Big thank you mate. If you choose both devices exclusively for laptop, would you choose?