O.J. Simpson.
Nov 15, 2006 at 9:20 PM Post #16 of 94
He was already tried for the murder of Simpson and Goldman, so he can't be tried for that again. He can be prosecuted for any other crimes he admits to commiting, provided that the statue of limitations hasn't expired.

To me, it sounds like he's bored of not being in the press. I don't see how he's going to keep the proceeds from being paid to the Goldman and Brown families.

Why am I not surprised that Fox is the network airing the TV special.
rolleyes.gif
 
Nov 15, 2006 at 10:34 PM Post #18 of 94
yup. i was guessing his funds was running low so he did this to make some... so sad.
 
Nov 16, 2006 at 2:17 AM Post #23 of 94
What should we think of all the folks who lounge before their TVs, and drive the show's ratings through the roof? I hope that none of us are among them. I wonder what companies are sponsoring this travesty. Needless to say, the good old Fox network is spewing this garbage.
 
Nov 16, 2006 at 2:28 AM Post #24 of 94
I'm not surprised by Simpson's morality or lack thereof (for god's sake, the man brutally murdered his wife). It just takes an amazing amount of hubris to pull a stunt like this! It really is surreal.

It's sad but I suppose not shocking that the media plays along, as does anyone who buys the book.
 
Nov 16, 2006 at 3:17 AM Post #25 of 94
Correct me if I'm wrong but I remember hearing on Cold Pizza (on ESPN) that O.J. is getting 3.5 million for this little comedic stunt of his. I personally think it's a ploy to get more money a la Pete Rose.

I'm just disappointed that he's doing this at all. It brings back memories for the families of those murdered and it would've been better of him to remain in the shadows as he as done in the past few years. I for one, will not be watching the interview on FOX nor buying his new book. It's just for lack of a better word, repugnant.

P.S. My first post, and yes I know my wallet will suffer. :p I already bought a DB DT-770. I'm in pain already.
 
Nov 16, 2006 at 3:31 AM Post #26 of 94
And rubbing salt in the wounds at the same time....
 
Nov 16, 2006 at 6:18 AM Post #28 of 94
Shouldn't this discussion be in the Most Evil Thread of All TIME!!!! also posted?
 
Nov 16, 2006 at 1:01 PM Post #29 of 94
Quote:

Originally Posted by roadtonowhere08
If there was ever a reason to get rid of the Double Jeopardy Law, this would be it...


Personally, I think that law is a joke. IMO, of course...



But if they get rid of the law then it can't be applied retrospectively (at least that's my interpretation of the law - but I'm no lawyer so I could be wrong)

I also find it amazing that they could come up with new evidence or more evidence to convict someone but are unable to as they've already been found not guilty.

But I would question the sanity and judgement of a man who would be willing to go on TV and have an interview (and write a book) like this. I know that people seem to do anything for money but surely there are moral standards that people adhere to?!
 
Nov 16, 2006 at 2:08 PM Post #30 of 94
It isn't surprising that Simpson craves attention without taste or restraint, since he has always exhibited the classic traits of the sociopath. After all, sociopathology is merely a vicious variant of narcissistic object relations (see J. Reid Meloy's The Psychopathic Mind; H. Clerkley's The Mask of Sanity, one of the first books on the subject, outlines the connection). Simpson's perpetual equivocations, fluid dishonesty, shallow charisma and public grandstanding are all indicative of sociopathic behavior. It would be interesting to ask an observer from childhood whether Simpson exhibited the three classic signs: pyromania, cruelty to animals and bedwetting.

While some sociopaths are extremely cunning and stay at the fringes of societal awareness (Dennis Nilsen, Angelo Buono, before he was caught), many crave attention by proxy (Dennis Radar, Randy Kraft, the Zodiac killer, David Berkowitz). Others prove as inept in their pursuit of attention as they were in attempting to cover up their crimes (Kenneth Bianchi), while some seem to want to be caught -- not because they feel remorse and wish to be stopped, but because their craving for attention becomes so great that they eventually scratch the itch in public. After all, sociopaths are characterized by low impulse control and a lack of empathy, not discretion or restraint.

Theatrical hypocrisy seems a constant trait of the sociopath. In jail, Bianchi trumpeted his newfound status as a Christian and "minister," while Bundy excoriated pornographers and made last-minute maps of his crimes. These were not acts of contrition but transparent attempts at manipulation.

Vaudevillian manipulation also characterizes Simpson's approach to his how-to book on murder. Serial killer Carl Panzram's autobiography is atypical in its brutal and grimly amusing honesty (though he probably derived sadistic pleasure from repulsing the reader); Simpson's approach is far more characteristic of sociopathology: shady, manipulative and ultimately evasive. (A source no less authoritative than the DSM-IV characterizes the sociopath as inclining toward grandiosity while simultaneously craving admiration.)

For your edification: R. Hare's checklist for identifying a sociopath. Notice how many of the bullet points seem to apply to Simpson, and how many might lead to his confessing obliquely without taking direct responsibility.
  • Glibness/superficial charm
  • Grandiose sense of self-worth
  • Need for stimulation/proneness to boredom
  • Pathological lying
  • Conning/manipulative
  • Lack of remorse or guilt
  • Shallow affect
  • Callous/lack of empathy
  • Parasitic lifestyle
  • Poor behavioral controls
  • Promiscuous sexual behavior
  • Early behavioral problems
  • Lack of realistic, long-term goals
  • Impulsivity
  • Irresponsibility
  • Failure to accept responsibility for own actions
  • Many short-term relationships
  • Juvenile delinquency
  • Revocation of conditional release
  • Criminal versatility
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top