Quote:
The guy talks about expectation bias: his whole article is one good example of such bias. I don't like the authoritative tone he's using either
I'm not sure the guy understands the difference between a 192kHz sampling rate, vs a 192kHz frequency response upper limit. I think this is where the whole article gets into trouble, based on a cursory look.
The guy talks about expectation bias: his whole article is one good example of such bias. I don't like the authoritative tone he's using either