Jeremypsp
Headphoneus Supremus
- Joined
- Dec 2, 2011
- Posts
- 2,175
- Likes
- 74
Quote:
Hmm, not again, there must at least be 100 over people posting that link on this thread.
As to whether the Z is that bad in the tests, it's debatable, the one used in the rest is the EU ver., which is known to be inferior in the way that it is more treble focused. Whether it's true or not is still unknown, but for all we know, adding resistance to an earphone does most of the time focus more on the treble, so that may be the same case with the Z, making it come out bad in the tests.
Although personally, my Z sounds very good, miles ahead of the iPod Nano 4G that I have, in almost every way, but YMMV.
http://www.markuskraus.com/RMAA/Z1060/Z1060TF10.htm
^anyone else seen this? It looks pretty absurd, given that the Z1060 and F806 I listened to sounded nothing like that.
Hmm, not again, there must at least be 100 over people posting that link on this thread.
As to whether the Z is that bad in the tests, it's debatable, the one used in the rest is the EU ver., which is known to be inferior in the way that it is more treble focused. Whether it's true or not is still unknown, but for all we know, adding resistance to an earphone does most of the time focus more on the treble, so that may be the same case with the Z, making it come out bad in the tests.
Although personally, my Z sounds very good, miles ahead of the iPod Nano 4G that I have, in almost every way, but YMMV.