tev
100+ Head-Fier
- Joined
- Apr 21, 2002
- Posts
- 183
- Likes
- 26
Quote:
Tev, I as well was under the impression the L3000s only did well with rock and more particularly the harder variety.
I never even bothered to try them with large scale orchestral. Will certainly try that tomorrow.
Quote:
Strange, in my experience, their lack of soundstage make the L3000 a very poor choice for large scale orchestral music...
Until recently I too was under the impression that the L3000 were basically rock cans. But I was shocked at how well they portray the big expansive classical stuff. I especially like the way they do Mahler, which is both soloist and expansive at the same time. They have great separation, spatiality, and actually just enough width to be realistic. It's like sitting just a couple of rows back. So many touted classical cans miss the mark with tonal size. These give it to you across the FR! They aren't quite as refined as a good pair of Stax. But among the ATs that I've heard, they're great. And, there is no fatigue from bright recordings!
Anyway, this thread is about the W3000ANVs which are deserving of attention. I was disappointed that the W3000ANV's weren't better for this type of music because they are nicely balanced and have a remarkable soundstage of their own. Of all the AT's I thought these would work better for orchestral.
But, I love them for everything else.