Hello forum friends,
I wanted to share my experience with original Dragonfly v1.0 (DF1) vs Dragonfly Black (DFB).
My home setup: Yamaha RX-797 + Kef R300
At work: Laptop + Ath-MSR7
Music Collection: 3/4 320 kbps, 1/4 Flac format
Main reason why I purchased DF1 was to eliminate noise/static coming from laptop audio jack as I have all my music stored on laptop, hooked up directly into receiver.
DF1 solved this issue great, plus it added some serious punch to music. However, after initial hype, upon closer inspection and hours of listening, my impression with DF1 was - "artificially" boosted highs, like listening through equalizers where you max all high frequencies. If was harsh, over the edge, in your face...But in time, I got used to it and would never come back to old way (without DF1).
Then DFB came along. To be honest, the only reason I purchased it this time, is I'm too lazy to carry DF1 to work every day, so I wanted to have 2 Dragonflys, one for home, one for office.
Sound difference
First, let me say I'm not an audiophile, nor I have audiophile ears. I hear no difference in 320 vs Flac, DFB out-of-the-box sounded just they way I wanted! More melodic is the correct word. While DF1 was too harsh, DFB did just fine, pronounced highs (but not over the edge), and solid bass. However with KEF R300 first impression was - where are the trebles? Years of listening via DF1 made me accustomed to it's harsh highs so DFB sounded a bit "muffled" initially. I also needed to turn up volume a bit on my receiver (from previous 10 o'clock position to 11 and half o'clock) to compensate lower output. But after a while you start to appreciate better (more melodic) output of DFB. Same was with Ath-MSR7. DF1 can be tiresome after prolong listening, while DFB is totally fine, with some nice bass kicking.
Sound-stage
Here comes a shocker - DF1 has (artificially) wider sound-stage. I tried it with various tracks and this is my solid conclusion. Highs are so up font, that mids/bass are struggling to surface. DFB on the other side has lower highs and more prominent mids/bass so they sit closer together.
Volume control (Windows laptop)
DF1 I can listen at 45-50 laptop volume (really high), and that's comparable to around 15 volume with DFB. Comfortable level with DF1 is 10-20, while with DFB 2-5 is already too much if you want to listen to music in the background while doing something else. So volume fine tune is much better on DF1. Two things I've noticed:
1. Every time I plug DFB to laptop for a split second there's a hissing/static noise,while DF1 is dead silent. Not a big deal, just an observation.
2. When I plug DF1 it would (for a sec or two) gradually increase volume, kind of "fade in" effect, while DFB goes straight to full power.
Which one I like better: I guess that greatly depends on your gear (headphones/speakers) and type of music you listen. I'm more into hard rock so DFB is better to me. Also Ath-MSR7 are on the "bright" side, so DFB is a perfect match for them. Too bad I don't have my previous Momentum over-ear v1, as they are more on the "warm" side, eg less prominent highs to compare.
Is it worth it? Well, original DF1 used to be 249 EUR, now you get DFB for 99 EUR. So yes, you get great sound for much less.
One thing I have noticed Dragontail cable is a bit longer now (the one I got with DF1 is significantly shorter). Sorry, my first post so I can't post pics yet.
Cheers,