Hello, Raoul,
of course I know the hifi-forum, but Burson isn't discussed so regularly here.
I am really a very happy person today.
My working day started with driving into my company's parking lot with the FedEx employee and knowing that my parcel was on its way, I had to get out of the car smiling. I've actually been waiting for the CV3 since the beginning of this year and imported a Playmate Everest to bridge the gap.
Since I only used a DIY headamp without DAC before the Playmate, I can only compare the CV3 with this one, even if the comparison here is a bit limp...
My first thoughts about the CV3:
I imagined the CV3 to be a bit smaller based on the pictures. Alex von Burson had given me the measurements and pictures in advance and put them in relation to the CV2, but since I don't own it, I was a bit surprised. The workmanship is flawless and the material appearance is very high quality. The new case scores very well due to its narrower lines. By this I mean both the less pronounced front, which is additionally rounded, and the fins of the case, which are used for better heat dissipation. The "industrial" look of the amplifier has once again increased its value and I like it very much, both on its own and on my desk. I would be interested to know how it looks on a hifi rack, because here I personally see the look of the CV2 a bit ahead due to its clear and straight construction. Since I will use the amplifier exclusively on the computer, I am very happy about the new case.
My setup:
As I said, I operate the CV3 exclusively on the computer and therefore directly via USB.
As headphones I use an Audeze LCD-XC.
In general:
I'm certainly a very bad first owner, because I don't have a large selection of headphones to listen to, nor do I have a special taste in music. I started my studies with a self-made amp and a Bayerdynamic DT770 250Ohm (which was a lot of money for me about 10 years ago) and am very happy that I could improve my signal chain (LCD-XC already last year) bit by bit.
Sound impression:
It's positive that the CV3 doesn't have any background noise. Sometimes, like right now, I just wear my closed headphones so I can concentrate better when my girlfriend sees Tv in the same room.
Then it becomes obvious that the output power of the CV3 is a bit higher compared to the Playmate. When I heard Playmate at level 20 (Windows 100%), I had to lower the CV3 to level 10 and Windows 90%.
Also the CV3 doesn't get as warm on the case as the Playmate did. Here the optimized heat dissipation and the larger surface seem to work well.
I just listened to the test for a few hours. From Rapsongs over live Rap battles to Rock, Popsongs and Classic (Orchestra, Piano, etc.) everything was there.
In a direct comparison I would like to say that the CV3 sounds a whole step more dynamic and above all more powerful than the Playmate. The stage is outstanding!! Every single instrument is perfectly represented and can be assigned perfectly on stage. Just now I heard a rattle in the background and had to grin again...
Even if I am very satisfied, I am looking forward to further impressions and the first test reports.
If you have any questions, I will gladly try to answer them.
edit:
I still have a supplement.
The CV3 has two outputs, which have already been discussed here. Since I currently have a Mr Speaker Ether Flow closed 1.1 for rehearsal here, I was able to show my girlfriend perfectly that there are differences in headphones.
We plugged in both the headphones (LCD-XC and Mr Speaker Ether Flow 1.1) and the last song (Armin van Buuren - Blah Blah Blah) which I listened to as an A/B test alternating with both headphones.
Where the Mr. Speaker sounded completely lifeless, the LCD-XC could play its whole class and was much more present and took up much more space.
Certainly another topic but I had a positive experience with the second exit right on the first evening!