Greetings, I'm not meaning to get off-thread here, but ....
I'm in the process of getting funds together to get a couple of very good pairs of 'phones and an amp, so feel free to chime in on my question but I'm kinda aiming this at MacedonianHero as I've often found your posts read excellently and consequently have read some of your reviews.
In particular of late, the Kenzie amp and the T1.
I'm looking at that amp (plus perhaps the Matrix balanced) and the HD800s, and T5p.
The reason I'm here now is that right now were I to buy the T1 2nd gen it would cost me exactly half what the HD800s would, and although I'm not thinking the same will definitely be true of the T5p, it WILL still cost substantially less than the HD800s.
Now I know comparisons etc between different products are complex for many reasons, but initially I WAS looking at JUST either the T1 2nd or the HD800s, and I'm just curious as to why the Senn (again, to me here in the UK) costs almost twice the T1.
Could I ask you (and any others who may wish to answer) why you think that is, and what your thoughts are on that price difference.
I am not looking to create a HD800s vs T1/5p thread or discussion! I am simply genuinely puzzled, and extremely interested as to why the HD800s is twice as expensive.
Many thanks for any advice you may have.
Basically, I want to get the Kenzie, the HD800s and the T5p, plus maybe the Matrix M-Stage HPA-3B to enable me to use the Hd800s' balanced cable, presuming that isn't possible with the Kenzie amp. Current plan when funds permit!
Be well.