Because this thread is more and more long, and is more difficult finding relevant information, in
post # 2 I adding a few minutes ago 10 links of the posts of people (apart from me) that writing opinions / impressions of the h95 until now in this thread (I will adding in the same post more when they are appearing in next days / future). I adding too 4 links of 4 youtube videos (one is new from yesterday) that isn't from b&o sponsors or online publications but only from ordinary consumers.
I don't putting a link for the troll that posting obsessively very, very negative comments in this thread and in youtube and in Trustpilot (in last 2 places creating extra fake accounts; is possible he making fake account in head-fi too, and maybe in future again).
I don't posting a link of the opinion of my American friend that owing h95, either, because maybe some people thinking I want pushing my excellent opinion of the h95 with the opinion of my 'imaginary friend'.
And I don't putting the links of Trustpilot opinions / reviews because I realising that is possible creating fake account for good or bad posts, this is meaning that a genuine purchase isn't necessary for posting in that website like I thinking before. Is possible this happening here too, of course (making fake account), but here is more easy interacting with people that having new head-fi accounts and seeing the intentions or strange behaviour.
For me isn't a problem AT ALL if some or many people don't liking this headphone
for genuine real reasons or only for their sound preferences, not because they having strange hidden agenda, AND this is in both directions (criticising or praising this product). For this reason I trying too not putting links of videos, articles in magazines, online publications that will usually saying h95 is best/great headphone. Except if this is from a place with good not biased reputation like the excellent old Innerfidelity website (when Tyll Hertsens is there still about 2 years ago).
I saying before all opinions aren't equal. The opinions of Tyll, for example, for me are always important for taking in consideration. Some people having (much) more credibility than others, like comparing good and bad newspapers / publications / experts or not / TV, etc. But I think is still valid having real opinions from everybody here even with little experience, BUT they must be ideally from real consumers, not trolls, shills or similar people.