I writing more posts in last 24 hours than normally: with the initial review, then answering questions and writing more of extra features, but in this thread I'm only owner so this is normal in this moment.
I permitting myself now in this post speaking of my enjoyment of the music with h95, but I must saying first this: I don't believing in hi-res files for better audio, and I don't believing in burn-in. A headphone or earphone is ready after 1 hour or maybe 2, and maybe usually this isn't necessary. I don't believing in 50/100/300+ hours of burn in because my experience is telling me always this isn't real. In my opinion this ideas of burn-in are 100% psychological.
So, the h95 is having fantastic low frequency (bass) reproduction. The elevations in the frequency are in the more correct areas. No mid bass affecting the mids, and beautiful low/sub bass, but never excessive. The drums in 'Stinkfist', for example, by Tool (Aenima album) is sounding powerful and with excellent depth, the drums sounding like covering a good part of the soundstage like is normal in this type of song/music. The bass notes in any track in the h95 is clean, with very, very correct decay, never slow sounding muddy, or too fast that sounding unnatural. This aspect I sometimes missing a little in sa50 and I having putting the volume more high sometimes than I wanting for more correct bass reproduction, but even in that case, low bass isn't going enough deep sometimes.
Like I saying before, maybe the transition of the mids and treble is little more correct in sa50 (I don't 100% sure about this yet), but the treble is never killing my ears with bad terrible peak and isn't dark or warm either, but I think maybe is little less bright than sa50. But I hear more finesse in the high frequencies, the cymbals are having better decay and tonality, more natural than I remember in sa50. But this is again speaking in technical territory.
I don't liking when people saying often something is sounding analogue and not digital, I think this is a cliche. But this is the first time I will saying that what I'm hearing is sounding more natural, less digitised, the instruments sounding more like they sounding in the real world, with not adding extra artificial details. The details is easy hearing with h95 but more than the details is the natural sound flavour of the instruments. This is the best I can describing.
I listening now in total maybe 7 hours and the h95, in my opinion, is the best in sound quality of all the many, many (anc) wireless headphones and earphones I hear before. I saying this again: This is enormous surprise for me that b&o releasing this fantastic product. Is great they changing the shape of the earpads too because, even if more aesthetically nice for the headphone design, the people don't having round ears. And b&o design department producing a headphone that still looking really beautiful in person.