Enhancing ACSS Interconnects Inquiry -
Currently using 23 AWG solid Silver Balanced wire for ACSS -
https://www.partsconnexion.com/CONNEX-66070.html
1.5M lengths from R8 to Preamp, 2M lengths from Preamp to Amps.
This 1/4" OD cable fits snugly into the Krell LEMO connectors as well as the mini-XLR to the R8.
It sounds superior to Analysis Plus Silver Apex XLR interconnects.
Kingwa mentioned that a handful of customers in China order standard XLR connectors for ACSS to utilize boutique interconnects of their choice.
Came across a blog from John Swenson [Sonore/ Uptone Audio Engineer] pertaining to DC power [low-Z] circuits [also such as ACSS] where using star-quad geometry lowers inductance by up to 3X over single-pair cable referenced in
Post #1 -
https://audiophilestyle.com/forums/topic/31554-diy-dc-power-cables/?do=userPosts&mid=2573
I can't comment as to his assertions pertaining to cable wire and its purity but with minimal experimentation I've tended to prefer silver.
Also, very interesting is his assertion pertaining to proper shielding where using a mesh shield over the cable as a true Faraday cage, an insulated wire must connect both ends of the shield and the shield should not be grounded. Reference
Post 11 -
https://audiophilestyle.com/forums/topic/31554-diy-dc-power-cables/?do=userPosts&mid=2573
Seemed counter-intuitive to me but I tried it on both my AC cables [added 18AWG externally to the cable connecting both shielded ends of the cable and removed the shield connection to ground at the male plug], and the ACSS interconnects where the existing shield doubles as pin 1 - pin 1 ground. In the ACSS interconnect case, I added an additional 1/4" ID mesh shield over the entire cable and connected both shield ends with additional insulated 18AWG wire.
Pertaining to the AC cable mod, everything was improved, from bass definition to image specificity - especially out-of-phase soundstage imaging.
Before ordering the mesh for the ACSS, I tried this mod to some Analysis Plus XLR balanced interconnect I had lying around which consisted of two signal conductors surrounded by substantial copper mesh shield tied to pin 1 at both ends. In this case, I removed the shield from pin(s) 1 and tied both shield ends together using a separate insulated wire running outside the cable and added a second dedicated wire also outside of the shield to reconnect pin 1 at both ends. Same positive result - essentially, the treble snapped into a new focus and the soundstage became less forward - higher in magnitude than the same benefits of what I've experienced adding OCXO timing. But the ACSS connection was better than the modded standard XLR interconnects in this case.
So now what...
I'm curious to know if the lower- impedance ACSS will benefit from significantly lowering the inductance via star quad geometry as well as running a 5th wire as dedicated reference ground in place of a shield-inducing reactance between signal and ground. Then fully covered with mesh shield acting as Faraday cage...
Not sure if it will matter on 2M cable runs but I'm interested in trying it.
Kingwa [if I
properly understood our email exchange] said that the pin 1 ground is a reference only for the + and - current flow. So I'm thinking silver star quad for the + and - signal and a separate ground wire for the pin 1 reference and then the floating Faraday cage shield [both ends connected with insulated wire] on top of that.
I could buy the individual wire and hand twist the star quad with a 5th wire for ground reference but I'm not sure the degree the geometry will hold up if I bend it.
https://www.ebay.com/itm/385054086631?var=652933831665&hash=item59a70315e7:g:FtwAAOSw-Lxi80wj&amdata=enc:AQAHAAAAoJc5XXDTaMovUy/Ac9bQSWuSWaZ6DNk72cxJTfUF74U9iJrWcsKJFR9glb6rhPxP9GrvoV0sUYH4NkEAqMxpJoXd1jKI6yAVAk0Mq+2QQF9ROc2CCOMvp2DoUdrQnzxouAyvzn6NFc29mhBypUtT4I7n3D/5xaSZqFBIma5ZDlm8skMt5zXAlvPhfAXRhGFoqbaVdXUKYWukttGMgUxBvVE=|tkp:Bk9SR4b1z6jbYA
If I shrink wrap it together will it still bend OK? Suggestions welcomed.
Rich