canthearyou
Headphoneus Supremus
- Joined
- Jan 27, 2015
- Posts
- 1,711
- Likes
- 283
Ow, I guess no 560 killer. From a positive purchase to a pass :/
Were you expecting them to beat an $800+ headphone?
Ow, I guess no 560 killer. From a positive purchase to a pass :/
This is disheartening...Like the others, I was hoping for a 400 successor.
I'm sure it is a great headphone and I actually like the looks of it as well. If I didn't already have similar, I would grab it but I want a bassy-fun 400 sound to add to my collection. I was really hoping that this was it.
Went from a buy to pass...
With the 400i and 560 (and the 500 still going strong), why release the 400S? Basically just trying to hit the sub-$300 market and be the first planar in the range?
From what I have gathered, the naming should really have been:
400S = 300i (i.e. budget HFM)
400i = 500i (similar to the 500)
560 = this actually makes sense (500 + 6)
So what we really WANT is a true 400i = the 400 successor.
Before the new line, the 400 had a great following, why not give the people what they want?
Basically just trying to hit the sub-$300 market and be the first planar in the range?
MrSpeakers Mad Dog was the first, IIRC. Of course, the T50RP was much cheaper.
This is the 400i. It looks a little different in comparison to the previous 400s pic.
*This headphone needs WAY more power than I expected. I'm using a Project Ember on high gain, which can drive the he-6 to respectable levels and I don't feel that I'm overpowering the 400s at all. Plugging these into my HTC one (m8) , which is one of the better smartphones for powering full sized hp's, sounds somewhat anemic. There's just not nearly enough power there to get this hp going.
All this talk of a true HE-400 successor makes me think I should get the 400 instead of the 400s (the 400 is now down to $289 new).
Have yet to hear either headphone so now I'm wondering what are the cons for the old 400?
Scooped upper mids (if you like prominent upper mids, the 400 will disappoint), and really emphasized treble.
Right off the bat though, the 400S will have the benefit of being much more comfortable. I dont know how the two sound in comparison, but assuming they are somewhat similar, the comfort honestly makes the 400S quite worth it
So I guess its a choice between not enough bass on the 400s vs. less mids and irritating treble on the 400. Damn you Hifiman!