Quote:
So... you think just because you have a certain headphone and that you have an opinion about it makes you legit? On the other hand, there may be other reviewers who may have their own opinions on the same headphones.
The point is, due to the abundance of clear descriptive reviews, once you've read enough of these on the same headphone you'd have more credibility and valuable information as opposed to someone who's only listened it but haven't read up on the opinion of others on the same subject.
Also, aspects of sound quality can be proved objectively, and such knowledge does not require experience with the output itself in order to discern differences. In fact, such knowledge has more credibility than personal experiences due to the human brain's tendency to fool itself
This is one of the most ridiculous things I've ever read on this forum. I totally understand and sympathize (I was there too!) with new members/audiophiles wanting to contribute to headfi. That being said, the promotion of regurgitating unverified information about audio products as a legitimate form of "advice" is laughable.
You said it yourself--there is a clear abundance of very descriptive reviews. Why not direct people to primary sources? If I were to speak to one of my colleagues or try to publish a paper about a topic without citing WHERE I got my information from, I'd be the laughingstock of the academic community.Though it might be a little farfetched to compare forum posts on headfi to world of academia, considering that a lot of people are spending a significant amount of their savings on this stuff, I think it's better to err on the side of promoting accuracy and honesty when it comes to sharing information on this site.
That being said, there are a lot cases when someone just wants a quick and dirty blurb about a product rather than a long, drawn out review. It's totally cool if you just want to paraphrase what someone else said, but why not finish off your comments with a link to the review you read while you're at it?
I understand what you're saying when it comes to educating yourself about headphones and being able to relay some of the basics about a product. At the same time, though, you shouldn't expect new members (or old members looking for new gear) to somehow distinguish between information from posters who have "read it all" and those who are just talking for the sake of talking.
It's great that headfi has grown over the years, but unfortunately, it seems like good information is much harder to come by if you're very new to the scene. It actually kind of (imo) detracts from the entire purpose of lurking/joining the community for a lot of newcomers.