Greed
Headphoneus Supremus
- Joined
- Nov 19, 2012
- Posts
- 2,833
- Likes
- 227
As far as the headphone goes it's a source. It's an upstream component that helps contribute to the sound that's being fed to the headphone.
That's nice, but it is not what is meant by the term. "The source of the Nile" is not any part of the Nile upstream of the Delta.
Actually, source does not even include DAC. People who include a DAC in "source" are carrying over from the analog days of source->preamp->amp->speakers, so when the CD player was replaced by a PC and a DAC, they tended to lump both into "source" because it was equivalent to a CD player.
But in the meaning of the term "source", it is only the DAP or the PC.
I know that you're saying the DAC is the source in the purest sense, because it's where the sound originates from in your hardware chain, but I'm making the case for practicality's sake here. When someone asks for a source in a headphone review that doesn't give any associated equipment, I'd come in and start listing off different DACs and AMPs too just like Matt did.
I apologize for my semantic feaupaux. Can we get back on track?
I know I personally would consider the amp as part of the entirety of the source if someone were to hypothetically ask on one of my reviews on x headphone where I didn't list any other equipment. I would answer back with my computer, dac and amp-- No cables though.I too was thinking about both amps and dacs when I read your original question about what the source was. But I can understand I wronged myself when I specifically quoted the amp as a source. I just meant it feeds the headphones.
Does the villager on the bank of the Nile consider his source of water as the Nile itself or Lake Victoria, or even the rain and smaller rivers that fill the lake up?
Mad Dogs, yay!