Otto Motor
Headphoneus Supremus
FDX1 are better: smoother, more natural timbre, more coherent, wider stage...How would you compare the starfield to fdx1?
FDX1 are better: smoother, more natural timbre, more coherent, wider stage...How would you compare the starfield to fdx1?
How would you compare the starfield to fdx1?
You can actually go for Starfield since they have similar sound signature & also in cheaper price than Kanas Pro since they have been retired by Moondrop itself.Hey guys,
I read a lot of reviews about the Kanas Pro and if I go after it, this could be the perfect IEM for me.
But unfortunately you can't buy them anywhere no more so I have to look for another IEMs.
So I wrote in the Moondrop thread because maybe someone can recommend IEMs in the same price range that a very similar to the Kanas Pro (relaxed listening, laid back, good bass etc.).
I have the Stagediver 3 (which are a little bit too dull and muffled) and the Shuoer Tape (which are to trebly and fatiguing).
Thanks.
Hey guys,
I read a lot of reviews about the Kanas Pro and if I go after it, this could be the perfect IEM for me.
But unfortunately you can't buy them anywhere no more so I have to look for another IEMs.
So I wrote in the Moondrop thread because maybe someone can recommend IEMs in the same price range that a very similar to the Kanas Pro (relaxed listening, laid back, good bass etc.).
I have the Stagediver 3 (which are a little bit too dull and muffled) and the Shuoer Tape (which are to trebly and fatiguing).
Thanks.
They took just about a week for me to change from “is this itl” to “now I hear them opening up” and now they are golden sounding. So much better personality now, lovely bass thats nicely controlled and high end detail and sparkle.Tbh, 100 hours of burn in was recommended by the manufacturer but to me, around a week of listening with around 4-5 hours of listening session a day has been pretty enough.
Since they are pretty balanced sounding type, it may sound bland unlike u/v shape sounding iem. But what I was looking for in Starfield are mostly the technicalities, timbre & such. However, they still got pretty amount of bass to make it not to sound too boring imo.
Could you please share your EQ for the JVC ?The frequency response with the FD-X1 is more linear than the Starfield, and the technicalities are an improvement as well. While I'm not happy with the default tuning of either IEM, the FD-X1 is absolutely worth the effort of dialing in a proper EQ setting. With EQ, it is the best IEM I've ever heard. Granted, I haven't spent enough time with the Starfield, but I don't know how effective EQ would be at putting it at the same level as the FD-X1.
Hello everyone, i just want to share my thoughts on Blessing 2
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1b2z_5ejKVsjLF5bpsHHhgfSoumwU-NCa2IkLpP9LQ_g/edit?usp=sharing
I owned these for around 3weeks now i enjoy it so much.
IMO one of the best moondrop i tried (tried everything beside S8 and Solis)
Most of my reference point is the Sony M7 and M9 and Z1R because IMO they are the top performer in their price category
Interesting, good write up. Have you by chance ever heard the audiosense t800? Ive been waiting for a comparison of tbe 2. Really interested in the blessing 2 and the upcoming 6 ba + dd hybrid from audiosense in june. I like the moondrop kpe, but honestly liked my sony ex1k more in the end so didnt see a point in keeping both.
Nope i dont have audiosense t800
But what i do have is sony exk, for classical and orchestra exk handsdown win easily. And that bass texture is second to only z1r
But for everyday usage and other genre that has vocals i prefer my blessing 2 over my exk And as of now my exk is not used for 2 weeks (mainly because i've been branching out to k-pop and soon will trying some other asian pop)
But blessing 2 is what i call respectable top performer