Feb 6, 2010 at 4:00 AM Post #31 of 44
Of all the headphones I've tried in Apple store over the course of several months, QC15 sound the best. But, I wouldn't trade my KSC75 even for that one. Maybe I would, but not for the sound quality.
biggrin.gif
 
Jan 8, 2011 at 1:21 AM Post #32 of 44
 
[size=medium]
I got a chance to try them out. First of all, its one of the most comfortable headphone with the best packaging presentation. They sound much better than I thought even thought it is still pretty bad for its price. First of all, the bass is very flat, fast and natural. (What a surprise consider how over powered the Beats solo sound.) Aside from the bass, the mid is recessive. Much like ultimate ears. However, the vocal is really harsh and dry. Some song with a lot of Ssssssss makes this headphone almost impossible to stand. Is so sibilance that it hurts from listening to it. The treble is above average and some what ok in the detail consider the price is above $300. Of I returned them the next day. I guess I will stick with my Sennheiser lines of headphone for now. 
[/size]

 
Jan 8, 2011 at 1:24 AM Post #33 of 44
I thought the Beats sounded better than the Q15s actually, but either way, it's not aiming high LOL
 
Quote:
Of all the headphones I've tried in Apple store over the course of several months, QC15 sound the best. But, I wouldn't trade my KSC75 even for that one. Maybe I would, but not for the sound quality.
biggrin.gif



 
Jan 8, 2011 at 3:25 AM Post #34 of 44
I think they just show off your wealth...
 
Jan 8, 2011 at 3:55 AM Post #35 of 44
Jun 21, 2011 at 11:00 PM Post #36 of 44
I heard the fake studios sound better than the genuine. lol
 
Jun 22, 2011 at 12:36 AM Post #37 of 44
EDIT: My bad, didn't see the date of the OP, no reason why this thread should've been revived though...
 
Jun 22, 2011 at 1:38 AM Post #38 of 44


Quote:
Quote:

Originally Posted by stang /img/forum/go_quote.gif
....Bose, Beats, Monster etc are overhyped, overpriced garbage. You need some good closed, neutral cans. Heaps of headfiers will recommend a lot of headphones to you. Shure SRH840 will be good, that's a start.


stang, have you actually heard the Beats Studio out of your own rig, or any decent rig? I really like the Beats Studio, and believe that most who'd say it's junk probably haven't heard it with their own music out of their own rigs.

The reason I responded to this topic is because I'm actually listening to the Beats Studio straight out of my iPhone 3GS now. (At the moment, I'm listening to The Phil Palonen Project, Phil Palonen being the father of Sennheiser's Eric Palonen, by the way--TheDeliveryMan is Eric's username here. Brad Mehldau's on deck.)

The Beats Studio has the distinction of being one of the few $350 headphones available widely for in-store demo listens--but the unfortunate distinction of usually having (in my experience) pretty poor sounding retail demo setups that don't come close to doing this headphone justice. It is, to my ears, one of the best sounding active noise cancelers out there (I haven't yet heard Bose's QC15). While it does have punchier-than-neutral bass, it is not the bass-bloated beast I've seen some paint it as here--I'm left to believe that most of those who've come away with that impression after hearing it didn't hear it in a good setup.

My opinions of the Beats Studio are still consistent with my early impressions of it. In fact, since becoming an iPhone 3GS user, I appreciate the Beats Studio even more, as it sounds good right out of the iPhone, and comes with a microphone cable so I can use it as a headset, too. It also has really tiny plugs--on both sides of the lightweight cable--which makes for less strain on my iPhone's headphone jack than any of my other full-sized closed headphones. (The big mute button on the right earcup is also handy when one is out and about.) The Beats Studio also wears closer to the head than most full-sized closed headphones, so it looks less geeky when worn in public than, say, a SHURE SRH840 which is downright huge looking when worn. And, for those this matters to, the Beats Studio is, in my opinion, one of the best looking headphones on the head--I'm not one to care too much about that, though, and wear the huge-on-the-head SRH840 out in public very regularly (and proudly
smily_headphones1.gif
).

In my opinion, the Beats Studio is, howevever, expensive for its level of sonic performance, if you disregard the fact that it's an active noise canceler. However, priced as an active noise canceler--the good ones generally being quite expensive--the Beats Studio is actually very good, in my opinion.

I think the SHURE SRH840 is, sonically, the better headphone, and it's priced substantially lower. Because the SHURE keeps the sound in the headphone better than the Beats Studio, it would also be more appropriate for pro audio use than the Beats (that is, the SRH840 leaks less sound). (The SHURE also has better passive noise canceling than the Beats Studio.) For pro audio use, it's also important to know that the Beats Studio is an active noise canceler, which, though nice sometimes, means that it has circuit self-noise (albeit lower than most other active noise cancelers I've used). (One should also keep in mind that the Beats Studio only operates in active noise-canceling mode--there is no passive mode.)

If you want an active noise cancellation headphone, the Beats Studio is one of the best sounding ones currently available, to my ears. (The Beat Studio's leakage might prove a problem for some, however, as it did with the original poster above.)

Again, my opinions of the Beats Studio are still consistent with my early impressions of it



wow i actually quite agree with this. the only thing i truly hate about the beats studios is the durability.
 
Jun 22, 2011 at 1:53 AM Post #39 of 44
Well, the only headphone in the Beats lineup even remotely worth its price tag is actually the Pros... the Studio just about equals (some say worse than) other $100 offerings, pretty bad if you ask me.
 
Personally, the Studios are pretty bad. Detail and clarity is lacking quite a bit, and its bass (the selling point) isn't as magnificent as I thought it would be. It was (albeit slightly) muddy, and when coupled with its poor mids it was not a good show from Monster...
 
Jun 22, 2011 at 3:52 PM Post #42 of 44


Quote:



You're profile says you do not listen to "hippity hop", just mostly folk, country, and rock... Monster pretty much makes these headphones to sound good with bassy music (like hip-hop, techno, pop) after all, Dr. Dre is in the name. You have to like that kind of music to get the most out of those headphones. That's like me playing my hip-hop on a high quality neutral pair of headphones, I'm going to be bored as hell. Of course, the Pros are still very overpriced but they are a step in the right direction. Much better build quality and SQ than the Studios.
 
 
Jun 22, 2011 at 3:56 PM Post #43 of 44
meh, genre has nothing to do with it for me, I don't like reggae or electronic or what little hippity hop I do like any bassier than I like instrumental guitar or classical or vocals.  I do see what you mean though that the only way the beats have a chance is if you listen to hip hop and don't care about highly coloring your music and adding distortion. 
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top