Don't know whether to be appreciative of the contributors to this thread or pissed. Since this thread has peaked my interest into headphones and created a crater in my wallet.
I have almost next to no knowledge, when it comes to headgear. My initial interest into the M1060s came from my acquisition of a pristine pair of Carver ALS III. Made me feel like I wasted decades on dynamic drivers.
Just completed a 35 hr. break in. The stock sound was a bit fatiguing, in the higher registers (not to be equated with the dreaded ringing that others have had). So I tried a few of the less expensive mods: the paper towel mod (between the driver and the foam) and added a .75" trim of premium felt to the deepest recess of the stock pad walls. So far very happy, the highs have toned down just enough.
Ques:
I may have missed it (in this gargantuan thread), but is there a reason why owners are shying away from using a graphic equalizer, with a built in spectrum analyzer ?
I have almost next to no knowledge, when it comes to headgear. My initial interest into the M1060s came from my acquisition of a pristine pair of Carver ALS III. Made me feel like I wasted decades on dynamic drivers.
Just completed a 35 hr. break in. The stock sound was a bit fatiguing, in the higher registers (not to be equated with the dreaded ringing that others have had). So I tried a few of the less expensive mods: the paper towel mod (between the driver and the foam) and added a .75" trim of premium felt to the deepest recess of the stock pad walls. So far very happy, the highs have toned down just enough.
Ques:
I may have missed it (in this gargantuan thread), but is there a reason why owners are shying away from using a graphic equalizer, with a built in spectrum analyzer ?
Last edited: