[oshox]

I am going to be spending a bit of my tax return on my first tube amp, and I've pretty much decided on either a Little Dot MK II or III. They're both within my price range, and I've heard good things about both. What I haven't heard, though, is a side-by-side comparison. I don't know enough about tube amps to be able to tell from the specs, so I am asking anyone who's heard both to explain the differences between the two.

 

[Dept_of_Alchemy]

The MkII has a smaller footprint than the MkIII, just thought I'd throw it out there in case that matters.

 

[breakfastchef]

I love my MKII. I recall, though, that Penchum, in one of his posts, said to go with the MKIII for the extra $40. I am sure you cannot go wrong with either one.

 

[Penchum]

That's true. If you have the $40, go for the MKIII. Both are excellent amps and you couldn't go wrong with either one.