Leckerton Audio UHA-4 VS. Headstage Arrow 3g; A Comparison. MOBILE DEVICE WARNING

Apr 25, 2011 at 8:22 PM Post #46 of 155


Quote:
My Arrow is far from dry but that may have something to do with the 4,7uF Vcap dock sandwiched between it and my iMod. I appreciate the Arrow's versatility as well, as I want to drive more than just IEMs with it. But I can see that the UHA-4 may be better for IEMs only, and the usb dac is nice. There seems to be a lack of consensus on crossfeed superiority though.


Agree, my Arrow isn't dry or overly bright either.  I think it's pretty smooth.  I was thinking maybe my 2.2G is just different.
 
 
Apr 25, 2011 at 9:33 PM Post #48 of 155
Nice review.
Leckerton eh?
 
popcorn.gif

 
Apr 25, 2011 at 10:01 PM Post #49 of 155

The amount of effect produced by the crossfeed on the arrow (When set to "II") and the UHA-4 is equal, but I found that the Arrow distorted the sound field, the UHA-4's effect was much more natural.  And I cannot stress how much better the UHA-4 drove the HD650's than the Arrow, the arrow could drive them louder, but the UHA-4 drove them better,, FAR better. infact when I get back home i'm gonna be tossing a pizza in the oven and kicking it with a Coke, the UHA-4 and the HD650's
Quote:
My Arrow is far from dry but that may have something to do with the 4,7uF Vcap dock sandwiched between it and my iMod. I appreciate the Arrow's versatility as well, as I want to drive more than just IEMs with it. But I can see that the UHA-4 may be better for IEMs only, and the usb dac is nice. There seems to be a lack of consensus on crossfeed superiority though.



 
 
Apr 25, 2011 at 10:03 PM Post #50 of 155


Quote:
 And I cannot stress how much better the UHA-4 drove the HD650's than the Arrow, the arrow could drive them louder, but the UHA-4 drove them better,, FAR better.


Sounds like it has a nice synergy going on there.  Something I'm struggling with a bit right now on my ES5.  
 
 
Apr 26, 2011 at 12:16 AM Post #51 of 155


Quote:
And that is where you and I diverge : I dont really care how big it is as long as it has what I'm looking for sonically. I had no problems jamming either D4 or P4 into a camera case, slotting my 6G Nano into the top and it looks like it was *made* for it. I realise that the uHA-120 is larger again, but when cn11 claimed that the bass had more impact than his Lisa III, I expect a lot of folk got excited.  For those of us who value 'transportable' over strictly 'portable', this could be a good option - as you said, the fun comes in trying to separate reality from hype.


The mad scientist in me is pondering how to build his M3 as a transportable unit
ph34r.gif

 
 
Apr 26, 2011 at 12:21 AM Post #53 of 155
Apr 26, 2011 at 12:39 AM Post #54 of 155
i had requested silver faceplates and  a black case
 
Apr 26, 2011 at 1:10 AM Post #55 of 155
Wow.  Nice review/comparo, and surprisingly, didn't even sound all that close.
 
Will add this to my list when they get more black models made or B-Stocks in.  Cheers for the time/effort!
 
Apr 26, 2011 at 1:53 AM Post #56 of 155

 
Quote:
Quote:
The mad scientist in me is pondering how to build his M3 as a transportable unit
ph34r.gif


Switch to full SMD?

 
 
That would required designing my own board which is beyond me at the moment. I was thinking more along the lines of a slim enclosure and power via battery pack (like the Energizer XP8000/18000).
 
 
 
Apr 26, 2011 at 3:28 AM Post #57 of 155
a couple of questions:
 
- are they resistant to cell phone interferences? I hate when my Sflo2 headphone out catches my blackberry interferences and this would be my main motivation to use line out + amp...
 
- why are you "gonna use [the Arrow] to power the ER4s"? I have ER4-S (and now ER4-P too, thanks Anaxilus) and I have to decide which amp to drive them
 
thank you
 
Apr 26, 2011 at 3:45 AM Post #58 of 155


Quote:
 
- why are you "gonna use [the Arrow] to power the ER4s"? I have ER4-S (and now ER4-P too, thanks Anaxilus) and I have to decide which amp to drive them
 
thank you


I recommend you try the Leckerton since you can return it and it's cheaper off the bat.  If you like the sound then stick with it.  If you feel the bass is lacking and want the feature set of the Arrow then try that after.  Hopefully the cheaper option gets you the sound you want.  I don't see a problem driving the ER4S with either at all.  You should be in good hands either way.
 
Maybe I should just order one and put this lingering question to rest in my mind.
 
 
Apr 26, 2011 at 4:15 AM Post #59 of 155
 
The entire time I tested the amps they were sitting on top of my droid which was linked to my computer providing it internet access, I never noticed anything. I did run the droid for a few minutes with GPS, Bluetooth, and Wifi on. but still noticed nothing, but I use a Verizon phone, a GSM device might be different, I cannot say. There are many different handsets out there and they are all build/ shielded differently so YMM(significantly)V. 
2. I plan on using the arrow with an Iphone 5 (I am currently going month to month, i was due for an upgrade april 3rd) and wanted to attach the Arrow to the back of the Iphone, keeping it super slim. Sound wise I know the UHA-4 would sound better, but I want that slim rig because I plan on taking it everywhere the phone goes, sort of like a permanent amp of sorts.
 
Apr 26, 2011 at 4:57 AM Post #60 of 155
I'm the same Blasto.  It's really hard to give up the package and features of the Arrow.  Even if I got another amp not sure I would sell the Arrow.  >.<  I hate this....
 
I'm wondering how the 4G w/ treble booster will affect clarity and detail.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top