sgrossklass
Headphoneus Supremus
- Joined
- Dec 3, 2004
- Posts
- 2,803
- Likes
- 22
So the internal part of the hinges isn't covered with anything stock? That might explain the very slight hollowness that is still present when comparing the sound to, say, the HD590. I wouldn't have removed the foam over the grilles, the hard plastic surface alone certainly reflects sound better. I guess there's no obvious way to remove the grilles (glued in, possibly?)?
Current EQ:
Code:
BTW: I've had a closer listen to soundstaging. Pretty good, I'd say, if a touch obstructed by the slight hollowness. Works well for classical. I prefer a slightly brighter sound there however, like the EQ from my post yesterday gives.
Interestingly, even the ICF-SW30 which is noticeably rolled off in the treble (overdone FM deemphasis) sounds like Super-Duper-Fi with these cans (not accounting for noise), which is really just silly. Like I said, the stock EQ is a bit overdone... (At least its simplicity makes software EQing relatively easy.)
EDIT: Reducing the volume for 622 Hz seems to have reduced the hollowness.
Code:
Current EQ:
Code:
Code:
[left]0 4 6 6 4 2 1 0 0 0 1 1 3 3 4 6 6 6 4 0 4 6 6 4 2 1 0 0 0 1 1 3 3 4 6 6 6 4[/left]
BTW: I've had a closer listen to soundstaging. Pretty good, I'd say, if a touch obstructed by the slight hollowness. Works well for classical. I prefer a slightly brighter sound there however, like the EQ from my post yesterday gives.
Interestingly, even the ICF-SW30 which is noticeably rolled off in the treble (overdone FM deemphasis) sounds like Super-Duper-Fi with these cans (not accounting for noise), which is really just silly. Like I said, the stock EQ is a bit overdone... (At least its simplicity makes software EQing relatively easy.)
EDIT: Reducing the volume for 622 Hz seems to have reduced the hollowness.
Code:
Code:
[left]0 4 6 6 4 2 1 0 2 0 1 1 3 3 4 6 6 5 3 0 4 6 6 4 2 1 0 2 0 1 1 3 3 4 6 6 5 3[/left]