I don't have any Audeze but I do have several HIFIMAN and an M1060 (yeah, I know it's not really a LCD-2 but it has some similarities). Sound presentation wise the 95X has a lot in common with the HIFIMAN Edition XX. I think the large ear cups on both give them a rather unique vertical sound stage. Both headphones are laid back but the 95X has less bass and definitely can't hit anywhere near as hard. The 95X is faster and cleaner sounding, especially in the midrange (the weakest part of the Edition XX, IMO). The Edition XX is rather warm and the 95X is less so but doesn't sound cold. It's close but I would say the 95X has more detail but not in an overwhelming way.
I should note that when I said the 95X sounded more like a planar, it has that same subtle texture characteristic to the sound, I think it's because it's because both have a large, flat diaphragm instead of a cone like a dynamic. It's hard to describe but when I first tried the 95X I definitely remember thinking to myself, "Huh, this sounds like a planar."
Compared to the M1060 the 95X is way faster. The M1060 is thick, full, and slow by comparison. And the bass slam on the M1060 especially with a little eq is really good. The 95X just can't compete in the bass but it has a lot more detail and sounds a lot cleaner.
Overall, I would say even bone stock, like mine is, the 95X is a decent value at $450, even with its limitations. But if are looking for a more traditional headphone driver design that has some of the unique characteristics like vertical soundstage, a large-sized HIFIMAN like the Edition XX or Ananda (that one might be closer match since it has less bass than the XX) might be a good fit.
Anyway, sorry for the rather unstructured musings. I hope it helped.