I suppose it takes some time to find out what sounds good to one's ears... And, more importantly, to realize & admit that good sound is not necessarily achieved by the most expensive toy available.
I had to go through some gear until I've realized what I'm looking for in a headphone (with speakers, it seems to be easier...). And then of course there's always the curiosity to experience the "next level" in sound, which supposedly can be achieved with the newest, most expensive, flagship headphone and the fanciest amplifier on the market. Sites like
Hype-Fi Head-Fi don't help in that regard...
Sure, the ESP-950 isn't the end-all headphone. If someone is looking for a different sound signature, there are always alternatives. But I've now listened to three of my favourite albums with this thing, and it passed the test with flying colours. Among the criteria I have when evaluating a new headphone is a silly one: I don't want the resolution to be too high. I know that it is desirable for some people to have the equivalent to an electron microscope in a headphone... I don't. On too many records there's too much nasty stuff I don't want to hear. Especially headphones with boosted treble tend to highlight even tiny flaws in the mastering of a record - the ESP-950 doesn't. The flaws are audible, yes, but not distracting.
And yes, they're very comfortable too. I'm not very fond of the pleather earpads, but that's about it.
One question, is there a possibility to lock the volume controls for left and right channel on the E90? I love to be able to control both channels individually (why don't dynamic headphone amps have this feature?) but it's a bit finicky to change the volume without altering the channel balance.