LaughMoreDaily
Headphoneus Supremus
Even if you're treble sensitive, use them for a few days on a lower volume than you'd normally listen to and your brain will auto-EQ for you.
LOL. That's hilarious. Really?
Even if you're treble sensitive, use them for a few days on a lower volume than you'd normally listen to and your brain will auto-EQ for you.
LOL. That's hilarious. Really?
LOL. That's hilarious. Really?
Too many pages to check the difference between ZS3 and ZST. I'm more into smoothness, detailed sound, instrument separation/imaging, great soundstage and controlled tight bass. I like it to sound like I'm in a big theater. Which will be the better choice? Can someone give the difference about how they sound?
The brain is probably designed to pick up on sudden changes rather than subtle ones over time, it's probably a survival thing.
"Burn-in" is actually 100% psycho-acoustical phenomenon all in your brain.
The mechanical part is "set-in" after a few seconds or less of movement, a simple 20-20kHz frequency sweep will set-in the diaphragm completely and forever, already done in the factory.
Don't be fooled by other nonsense.
Get a pair of IEMs that sound close-enough to your favorite speakers and just listen to them plenty.
'I'm more into smoothness, detailed sound' - really raising the bar quite high with that requirement as they're almost opposing trends with Chi-Fi earphones. Detail tends to come with more pronounced treble in my experience.
I always recommend jvc spiral dots. Always.
Considering the fact that the largest ear tips that came with the ZST could not create a proper seal, what sized spiral dots might work for me - M/L hybrid size or L?
Also, I have never owned foam ear tips & I am curious about how they sound when paired with the ZSTs. Does something like Shure EABKF1 foam sleeves work well with the ZST?
PS: I wish these ear tips are not so expensive. They are almost as expensive as the ZSTs themselves!
Not always. The first IEM that comes into my mind is Magaosi BK50, like I already recommended to asker. Big "holographic" soundstage, good layering, great imaging, smooth highs and overall sound but details come out very well almost in every frequency region. Only bass area sounds littlebit "soft" and has less details/crispiness but still has nice quality and presence.
Too many pages to check the difference between ZS3 and ZST. I'm more into smoothness, detailed sound, instrument separation/imaging, great soundstage and controlled tight bass. I like it to sound like I'm in a big theater. Which will be the better choice? Can someone give the difference about how they sound?