Beginning yesterday, I began to receive messages one after another asking me to comment on the latest Rognir test. Someone saw an ulterior motive in it. Some were very surprised (from those who had the opportunity to listen to Rognir with their own ears). Some suggested that the headphones were faulty. I don't want to argue with anyone. To be completely frank, my opinion about all of this can be described by a quote from Confucius: "If someone spits at your back, it means that you are ahead". I apologize, but I am as entitled to my opinion as anyone. Furthermore, I am so confident that the Rognir is one of the best closed headphones that I am willing to offer anyone who takes the risk of ordering these headphones a full refund (excluding shipping costs) if they are not to their liking. Why? And I just want everyone to be able to decide for themselves where the truth is and where it is... delusion.
One last thing... about the measurements. Yes, that's a very important point. But at the same time, there is no one correct universal methodology.
Let's compare non-normalized measurements of the same HiFiMan Ananda (just for example) headphones obtained from different sources (rtings, Crinacle, RAA, DIY-Audio-Heaven) on the same scale:
Which result is correct? The question is meaningless, because the stands are different, because the methodologies are different too, and there is no way we can compare the measurements with the real sound perception.
P.S. Sorry for my awful English...