- Joined
- Jan 15, 2015
- Posts
- 6,773
- Likes
- 12,485
This ending sentence hits the nail on the head!I personally think this industry needs more quality than quantity.
This ending sentence hits the nail on the head!I personally think this industry needs more quality than quantity.
After some time with the RR1’s, I would like to see better bass extension in a RR2. The bass, which is very good and has good quantity, could use more extension. On songs with deep synth bass, the subass is pretty low. I’d like more rumble. So a RR2 with better extension top and bottom and bigger soundstage is what I’d want.
Hello @talan7 ,
Appreciate your inputs and everyone else above as well who have mentioned the so called "RR2".
I just wanted clear some confusion, there won't be an “RR2”. That's for many reasons -
1) Constant consumerism - I don't make Headphones for a living, I am lucky enough to be in a position to have multiple businesses which prevent me from being pressured like other Manufacturers to constantly launch new products for quick sales. I don't care about sales. My job is to optimise Manufacturing and Quality, not launch new products quickly. That is just never going to happen under my watch. Of course, there will be future products but the RR1 was always made to be a standalone product with no successors.
2) Product Value
New products tank the value of old Headphones and make them essentially worthless all while also damaging the Brand's value.
Furthermore, I am also against the concept of discounting. No product will ever be discounted under my watch. Discounting is a disrespect to the customers who have paid full price and also show's a Company's perception towards their own product.
So, for these reasons and many reasons I might have forgotten, there will not be an “RR2”. I always urge people to buy from other brands where they don't find similar limitations.
I have been a Headphone enthusiast for over 9 years and have owned some of the most important Headphones ever Manufactured, I personally think this industry needs more quality than quantity.
Innovation, fixing issues and refinement of a product is quite a difficult task.
So it's understandable that not every manufacturer is up for it.
Yup, most just tweak a little bit, wrap the same in a slightly different packaging and push it out. A good product will stand the test of time and the RR1 seems like a good candidate.
As a personal anecdote, the STAX SR007 Mk2.5 still holds its own after more than 2 decades. A fast, bassy e-stat that still packs a punch.
does the SR007 mk2.5 have more bass than RR1?
In my experience yes. It's a lot more tactile and thicker.
E-stats are not known for being bass proficient in terms of extension and quantity. Quality and speed yes, but extension and impact, no. Saying that, the SR007 MK2.5 does seem to measure well in the bass department.Probably yes. It's the bassiest e-stat I've ever tried.
E-stats are not known for being bass proficient in terms of extension and quantity. Quality and speed yes, but extension and impact, no. Saying that, the SR007 MK2.5 does seem to measure well in the bass department.