Latest Thread Images

JVC HA-FXZ 100/200
Nov 23, 2012 at 9:35 PM Post #152 of 3,271
Quote:
autumnholy said:
How's the sound?
Click to expand...

Hi autumnholy , apa khabar ?  great to see Malaysian member here . I am Malaysian too and I am from Penang but currently working in Singapore :)
 
I play with my i5 and I only have klipsch s4 , original apple earpods , Munitio Nines and JVC HA-FX1X . What i can say is that this FXZ100 really sound diferent and is the best I heard so far :)
ksc75smile.gif
atsmile.gif

 
Nov 23, 2012 at 10:04 PM Post #153 of 3,271
Hi greetings from Kuching.
 
Previously I have the Ha-fxt90, and I found it to be too treble happy for my ears. Can't stand the harsh, unrefined treble. Sounds thin to my ears. How about this fxz100? Heard currawong mentioned something about someone saying it's better than fxz200. Eyeing on either fxz200 or denon ah-c300 for a truly bass experience. That's why I wonder if fxz100 do inherit the treble happy nature of fxt90.
 
Thanks. inb4 fxt90 sounds great for some tracks.
 
Nov 24, 2012 at 2:24 PM Post #154 of 3,271
I've bought a watch from SeiyaJapan before, he's legit.

Idk about getting an IEM through him but watches are A-OK for sure.

edit: here's at least one early impression and review, but in Japanese

http://av.watch.impress.co.jp/docs/news/20121018_566904.html
http://av.watch.impress.co.jp/docs/review/review/20121109_571156.html

translate makes it seem like they were pretty impressed

FXZ200 overall more warm
 
Nov 24, 2012 at 4:16 PM Post #155 of 3,271
hauton said:
I've bought a watch from SeiyaJapan before, he's legit.
Idk about getting an IEM through him but watches are A-OK for sure.
edit: here's at least one early impression and review, but in Japanese
http://av.watch.impress.co.jp/docs/news/20121018_566904.html
http://av.watch.impress.co.jp/docs/review/review/20121109_571156.html
translate makes it seem like they were pretty impressed
FXZ200 overall more warm
Click to expand...


If you were to chose between the 2 (200 &100), which would you chose?
 
Nov 30, 2012 at 6:29 PM Post #156 of 3,271
Quote:
waynes world said:
 
The hype-train is slowly pulling out of the station!...
popcorn.gif
Click to expand...

 
And when I said slowly, I meant it lol! Can't wait to see some reviews of these puppies!
 
Nov 30, 2012 at 7:06 PM Post #158 of 3,271
Nov 30, 2012 at 11:42 PM Post #160 of 3,271
Yeah I pulled out of my first order, because they didn't have them stock like advertised. But now Amazon Japan Prime has them in stock. I'll probably order next Friday (just got the TDK IE800 dual drivers in - which I'm loving right now ), and will probably see the 1964 EARS V6 on Monday. So this train is slooooooow. Someone will probably beat me in ordering them at this point. I'm still debating if I will go for the 100 or 200 first. We'll see.
 
Dec 1, 2012 at 4:41 PM Post #161 of 3,271
Ok, so the fxz100 is best fit for speed and greart detail overall while the fxz200 has better tone in human voices and rich texture of instruments? I am confused.
 
Dec 1, 2012 at 4:48 PM Post #163 of 3,271
Quote:
vlenbo said:
Ok, so the fxz100 is best fit for speed and greart detail overall while the fxz200 has better tone in human voices and rich texture of instruments? I am confused.
Click to expand...

noone said that the tonality is better or worse on the fxz100 compared to fxz 200. Only thing that is known is that someone said that the frequency response in fxz100 is more balanced than on the fxz200 because fxz200 has more bass...
 
Dec 1, 2012 at 4:52 PM Post #164 of 3,271
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 7 (members: 0, guests: 7)
Back
Top