My H50 got even more smooth and clean, "softer" you might say after burn in. Especially in bass and treble region.So few first impressions. Mind you it is a bit too early to be completely unbiased, when jumping from coloured tuning iem like EE EVO due to brain burn in. But i will try.
First i am really surprised that they are not any bigger than its predecessor as it is a trend now lol. Fit is the same magic that keeps me stuck with ISN iems.
Now the sound is really where its an improvement. It is very different from h40 tuning. But for me in a good way.
It is so much more refined.
H40 was a fun non fatiguing casual listen but it lacked refinement. And H50 jumps into this more revealing mature tuning with excellent control across the board. Its really rare at this price range.
Bass is now subbass focused allowing for some extra air in the signature.
Mids are on a slightly drier side focusing on clarity rather than lushness.
Treble is where i see massive improvements. I am running h50 on sp2000 so the area gets a slight boost. And this can make or break a deal. On h40 that boost was welcome to push treble into balance but at the same time revealed its crudeness. On h50 i don't hear that anymore. I think treble is a touch ahead of mids though. But it is well controlled.
This kind of tuning changes allows for more layered sound. The imaging has improved significantly. Which was a weak point of H40.
The bad?
it depends what you want. I have a feeling that my sp2000 is not the best pairing to form a most balanced set up. It is on a more revealing and dried sound side. so bear that in mind. I can see it lacking in some midbass and lower mids warmth for genres require require that region . But source pairing can help.
Mind you i am saying that after tip rolling.
Had settled on whirlwinds this time.
(Tried few variants of sednas, acoustune 07, final E pinks, Epros, spiral dots, spiral dots++ etc)
But i can tell you one thing: i am really fussy on what plays my dear Hans Zimmer. And i quite enjoyed it on these. Its a first entry level iem that i can say that about. With no bloatness or peaks. And pretty well separated and positioned instruments.
For me it is really much required refinement of H40. Maybe if they tuned a touch more midbass in it would have made a more all rounder? But i have a feeling my source is not doing it justice.
All in all if you want a glimpse of where high end iems can take you and you enjoy classical/orchestral music or any music that required technical prowess. H50 is for you.
There might be better options for rock unless you have a warm source
So you might notice change after awhile.
One drawback for me is that apparently they a bit large for my ears for long and lengthful listening compared with my Tripowin tc01 which fits much better for my small ears (also a great value iem btw). But you can adjust the insertion so it is fortunately not a deal-breaker. Because they sound really good. The upper hill is doing the fit problem for me, so I insert it more down to the nozzle area to the ear hole.
Did you tried with different cable BTW?
I am curious how it changes with cable..my penon mix is on the way. LoL I have so much gear on the way for the H50 setup...
Last edited: