Deftoned
100+ Head-Fier
- Joined
- Nov 10, 2006
- Posts
- 222
- Likes
- 10
I dont find them particulary good in any way. But I've only had the first version though. I think the upgrade to a pair of 30 dollar headphones is quite massive.
Originally Posted by kg21 /img/forum/go_quote.gif enough with the trying to defend ipod earbuds already. There's a big difference between saying something is not horrible and saying something is actually good, and I think some people are mixing these two things up. Just because you think they are not as bad as they are supposed to be doesn't make it good basically. OTOH if you believe they actually are good then you should quit head-fi and only listen to your apple earbuds, you can save A LOT of money and we don't have to talk about the earbuds it's a win win IMO. I'm not angry at this particular thread, I just feel like if you are going to use the argument that the earbuds sound pretty good, you could say anything is good. In that case Bose makes awesome high end audio, the Geo Metro is an awesome car, Gigli is a good movie, the Memphis Grizzlies are a good basketball team, etc. |
Originally Posted by shigzeo /img/forum/go_quote.gif i thought the grizzlies played for vancouver, but then i don't watch much hockey |
Originally Posted by blipmusic /img/forum/go_quote.gif Last I checked "good" was a relative term. I don't see anyone saying "**** throw your 701s away and get iBuds, they r0x0r jor s0x0r!" and if anyone would make that claim I don't think he or she would be taken seriously. Further, noone is actually losing money (they're stock buds, and as such they're ok, though it seems Sony will ship their new player with a plastic version of the EX90LP - correct me if I'm wrong - which, I assume would trump the iBuds...). What's the harm, really? |