diamondears
Headphoneus Supremus
- Joined
- Oct 1, 2014
- Posts
- 1,867
- Likes
- 133
Well after sevral months of listening to my micro iDSD there is only one area that doesn't quite match the outstanding DAC section, that being the headphone amplifier. I am wondering why iFi did not choose to operate it into class A, as I feel the slight tendency toward brightness others have described might have been eliminated.
The sound to my ears is a bit bright and congested, particularly noticable when using the 600 ohm Beyerdynamic DT880. Did ecessive heat or power draw prohibit this curcuit from running in class A? Of course I understand that the 4 watt power output spec would have been substantially reduced however, the improvement in sonics should be a good trade off.
Even the headphone section on my Marantz PM6005 integrated has a more relaxed, open and bigger presentation with no loss of detail when compared to the iDSD using my Sennhieser HD650, 300 ohm DT990 and 600 ohm DT880 headphones.
I am by no means bashing the iDSD micro, as it has IMO no peers at this price point. Only presenting the one area that could hopefully be improved in future versions from this excellent company.
What would a Class A amp section bring into the table? The micro has very low distortion already. If your ears find it bright, there's the XBass. If you find it dark or congested, there's the 3D. Why would you want more heat and dinosaur power consumption in a portable?