For what it matters ……
While I noticed the “glitch” issue when charging the Diablo with a low battery and listening I experimented later and the same thing would happen with a fully charged battery and the unit on charge.
With the power adapter supplying the power the Diablo would what I am calling “glitch” under high load but on battery only it would not.
So we agree it is a power supply issue but it isn’t a battery issue just one where some chargers used as desktop power supplies can’t keep up with the current demands of, in my case, 13 Ohm low efficiency planars.
That is all an aside as my comment was in response to a specific question about perceived sound improvement on different gain settings and I believe the behaviour on different chargers on different gain demonstrates that the Diablo is drawing more current on higher gain for the same volume level.
You say low gain will sound better by default than higher gain. I think not, the sound is in no way better on Eco than higher gain modes with headphones that need some power. That was also the observation of the poster who I was responding to.
I’ll leave others who understand the inner working of the Diablo to determine whether say 10 o’clock on Turbo results in more distortion than about 2 o’clock on Eco for the same volume level as you state it will. I’m not as clever as the ifI design engineers and I’ll put my trust that they understand how to build something that can be used at the higher output power the unit is capable of and still sound absolutely optimal !!
Absolutely ‘a thing’,..
the ’gain settings’ we are referring to are not the same as software gain adjusts, that DO move equipment into less accurate playback territory (and the spec sheets regarding said parts will sometimes show that too), but, in the Diablo I believe we are changing the operating parameters..
I could see this with an early unit that failed on me.. (the second battery circuit (my guess is it is a clever battery design that has two isolated areas OR the way the amps function internally literally double up their usage circuits (I didn’t design/don’t know)) when in ECO mode it ran flawlessly, as it was using the battery part that was ‘fine’, but it basically required being plugged in to get the full power, at which point the ‘higher fueled’ modes (normal and turbo) could operate..
I do not feel it operates in class A mode in ECO
There are audible differences between Normal and Turbo (initially I thought this was due to my ‘breaking in‘ the Diablo in Single Ended mode, and then when I switched to Balanced mode use, logically, ‘some of the circuit(s)‘ hadn’t been broken in…., may have led to some ‘slight differences’ in the sound profile found in each mode…
But it is ‘a real thing’ and is a reason that users may wish to grab an IEMatch product, as some genres I prefer in Turbo and others in Normal playback mode… There are differences in edge of notes and blackness/soundstage (whilst soundfield seems the same in both, the slight ‘cues’ regarding note edges DOES make a difference to enjoying some genres of music..
The headphones I run from the Diablo, seem to have the same usage spots on the dial (2pm Eco/12o’clock Normal/10am Turbo).. and I do not agree that there is a diminished sound quality, necessarily, between Normal and Turbo, unless one prefers Normal mode operation, then that argument would be subjectively true.
Definitely a different beast when run ‘above ECO’ though, and I haven’t used ECO mode in more than a year… (due to the sound profiles that each mode gives)
Normal and Turbo is where the Diablo shines…