While not an engineer, I understand the baisc differences between an opamp and a transistor array (and monolithic amp chips. The original poster used this phrase "Usually using discrete chips for an amplifier is superior to using op amps for an amplifier but alot depends on the exact implementation". It struck me that discrete chips was a bit confusing - and not the usualy way those terms are used.Those are not OpAmps, they are transistors in that package that look like OpAmps. There are transistors arrays underneath as well, and those are discrete architect
@xand mentioned the buffers would be discrete design then it would be the little guy that isn’t circled in the picture.
The Amp11 and Amp8 are totally discrete design as transistors are being used instead of an integrated chip system or OpAmp. I don’t see why calling them a discrete design is an oximoron? That is a strange statement , unless someone doesn’t know what he is talking about
An OpAmp is more than just transistors being printed on a chip and the transistors in a chip package is less than an OpAmp
My point was that the term 'discrete' in the two-channel world, refers to a circuit built from indivudual caps, resistors, and semicondictors (or tubes) . A chip, in the sense of a substrate with a complete circuit contained in it, is NOT discrete- it is integrated, hence the term 'integrated circuit'.