iBasso DX300 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 Octa-core 6GB RAM ******NEW Firmware 2.00 Android 11******
Dec 8, 2020 at 5:12 PM Post #211 of 14,596
I can wait longer (it's not a problem for me), but that extra time needs to be appropriately used by iBasso. I mean that DX300 should work smoothly, shouldn't get as hot as DX220 and have less bugs than Cyberpunk 2077. :sweat_smile: Oh, and charging when acting as USB-DAC would be nice.
and back up, yes. 12 solid hours on 24bit files

1607465436728.png

Master of Sound Quality indeed!
 
Dec 9, 2020 at 4:32 AM Post #212 of 14,596
Interesting bits are in the comments :wink:

BA3789C1-5636-4F09-9DDB-EAD9E8B4F1DA.jpeg


C145C55F-3385-4588-920D-E4958F836ADC.jpeg


So no Sabre, here is a scoop... and still fuzzy about when "soon" can be anything but probably not Q2
 
Last edited:
Dec 9, 2020 at 5:55 AM Post #214 of 14,596
That means Q1 next year lol. If it doesn’t have Sabre, then what is it going to have ? I wonder
Probably AKM. But I hope that they will shock the World. :)
 
Dec 9, 2020 at 6:07 AM Post #216 of 14,596
Shocking the world would be using something they never used before, R2R ladder IC chips !!!
Or even developing their own chips - that would be "maaaan, they've got my respect". :D
 
Dec 9, 2020 at 8:18 AM Post #221 of 14,596
That means Q1 next year lol. If it doesn’t have Sabre, then what is it going to have ? I wonder
Would be prerty cool if ROHM Semiconductor MUS-IC BD34301EKV was possible.
 
Dec 9, 2020 at 8:20 AM Post #222 of 14,596
Dec 9, 2020 at 9:09 AM Post #223 of 14,596
Mango chips ? It would be the first player to have dual Mango chips, Dual mango Operations by OS and DAC. Oh well! It is nice to dream. I am still waiting for the DaC info

MOS_FPGA_M = MangoOS_FPGA_Master
 
Dec 9, 2020 at 9:31 AM Post #224 of 14,596
Probably not. Unless they bought a years worth of dac chips.

Also there are way bigger fish in the electronics space that need DACs and that makes most of them a higher priority to AKM because of scale.

This is not a dig at iBasso btw. It's just that if e.g. Sony needed millions of chips for PS5s and other electronic equipment then AKM will likely supply these bigger customers first.
 
Dec 9, 2020 at 11:00 AM Post #225 of 14,596
Also there are way bigger fish in the electronics space that need DACs and that makes most of them a higher priority to AKM because of scale.

This is not a dig at iBasso btw. It's just that if e.g. Sony needed millions of chips for PS5s and other electronic equipment then AKM will likely supply these bigger customers first.
That is only true if Ibasso made purchases after the incident. We have seen The Dx300 leaks for a couple months now, and as someone mentioned, at this stage of development, the parts must have been purchased many months back. Take Shanling M8 for example, it is recently released, and using AK4499EQ. They can not just buy on demands right ?
 
Last edited:

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top