I really like the DX 300 but kinda feel cheated that literally days after buying it, I have to spend $250 to get it to sound as good as one I could get for the price I paid for mine.....
This is why i was reluctant to post my initial findings before doing a final a/b after 100 hours.
is amp11mark2 better than amp11mark1?
Does it depend on ones sonic preferences?
Earphones/headphones used?
Type of music listened to?
Synergy of dap and amp module?
Burned in DX300 vs new DX300?
Listening at home or out and about?
Magical unicorn rainbow audio stickers?...
I dont know and wont have my final personal verdict for a few days.
For now its two voices. Mine and @whitiger blowing the trumpet.
This can happen in any thread for either enthusiasm or naysaying of a audio product - and the resultant sink or swim of the product (unfortunately)...and ripples, echos of voices repeating the same findings as factual, reor imagined.
The old head fi rule of dont comment unless you have geard it is still current and people without ready access to a shop rely on such impressions.
we can only hope they approach our own version of truth before we break out the credit card.
$50 bucks is $50 bucks and $500 bucks is a chunky chunk of change.
So lets wait and see what the other curious buyers who will end up having both have to say in a day or two.
could well be people are split on their opinion. Too early to call it either way.
But as Whitiger says the amp11mark1 will be the one people won’t have...and well eventually curiousity will take its course the other way for those buying DX300/amp11mark2 atm ...and one can probably easily sell it if need be.
For me i find the Amp11mark2 attractive and it draws me to listen to music more.
Others may find amp11mark1 is their drink of choice....
Lets wait and see before we collectively despair