Citan
100+ Head-Fier
- Joined
- Apr 16, 2010
- Posts
- 101
- Likes
- 12
I apologize if anyone feels "pissed on," that was not my intent.
Because it's sound science- where you can't tell whether someone's pissing on you or it's raining without testing the liquid and doing airtight DBT's.
These are the types of folks who back the so called objectivists stance, while the only ones who support the subjectivist side are hobbyist tinkers on head-fi.
Is Nelson Pass a "hobbyist tinkerer" then?
I would say the only people who divide things into subjectivism and objectivism are arrogant kids on head-fi
Is Nelson Pass a "hobbyist tinkerer" then?
I would say the only people who divide things into subjectivism and objectivism are arrogant kids on head-fi
Some in this thread seem more Hobbesian than hobbyist.
I apologize if anyone feels "pissed on," that was not my intent.
Concur. I for one welcome our new Objectivist overlords. Slide rules and K701s for all.
Nelson does have long experience in designing audio equipment, commercial success
and has in these later years turned towards "minimalist" designs - but if you actually read his Pass Labs Zen Amp and other articles you will find he continually compares versions of his designs on nonlinear distortion measures - usually reducing nonlinear distortion as the designs "advance"
he has awsome device knowledge and practical audio experience
however he has a Physics degree and is not a deeply competent signals/feedback educated EE as his wrong headed article on feedback proves - when pressed had to admit he exaggerated to support a preconceived "anti-feedback" position pandering to the target audience
Qualifications for what?
I'm not insulting anyone, I'm pointing out the ridiculousness of these arguments. I don't care what you believe or what you do.